ReviewThe Journal of craniofacial surgery2017
The Role of Skeletal Stem Cells in the Reconstruction of Bone Defects.
Review in The Journal of craniofacial surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multidimensional bibliometric analysis and global trends in the nervous system's role in bone regeneration.Regenerative therapy · 2026Article
- Sympathetic nerve inhibition enhances calvarial bone repair via senescent macrophage-induced osteogenesis and angiogenesis.Cell death discovery · 2025Article
- Harnessing the diversity and potential of endogenous skeletal stem cells for musculoskeletal tissue regeneration.Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio) · 2025Review
- Application of extracellular vesicles in diabetic osteoporosis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Review
- Chemokines network in bone metastasis: Vital regulators of seeding and soiling.Seminars in cancer biology · 2022Review
- Mechanisms of bone development and repair.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2020Review
- Cranial Neural Crest Cells and Their Role in the Pathogenesis of Craniofacial Anomalies and Coronal Craniosynostosis.Journal of developmental biology · 2020Review
- Priming Dental Pulp Stem Cells from Human Exfoliated Deciduous Teeth with Fibroblast Growth Factor-2 Enhances Mineralization Within Tissue-Engineered Constructs Implanted in Craniofacial Bone Defects.Stem cells translational medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Craniofacial surgery, since its inauguration, has been the culmination of collaborative efforts to solve complex congenital, dysplastic, oncological, and traumatic cranial bone defects. Now, 50 years on from the first craniofacial meeting, the collaborative efforts between surgeons, scientists, and bioengineers are further advancing craniofacial surgery with new discoveries in tissue regeneration. Recent advances in regenerative medicine and stem cell biology have transformed the authors' understanding of bone healing, the role of stem cells governing bone healing, and the effects of the niche environment and extracellular matrix on stem cell fate. This review aims at summarizing the advances within each of these fields.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.