ArticleAnnals of the American Thoracic Society2017
An Official American Thoracic Society Workshop Report: Noninvasive Identification of Inspiratory Flow Limitation in Sleep Studies.
Article in Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Flow Limitation Is Associated with Excessive Daytime Sleepiness in Individuals without Moderate or Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2024Article
- Leptin signaling in the dorsomedial hypothalamus couples breathing and metabolism in obesity.Cell reports · 2023Article
- Respiratory effort during sleep and the rate of prevalent type 2 diabetes in obstructive sleep apnoea.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2023Article
- Accuracy of continuous positive airway pressure devices: the devil is in the details, the best is yet to come.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2023Article
- Respiratory effort during sleep and prevalent hypertension in obstructive sleep apnoea.The European respiratory journal · 2023Article
- Mandibular jaw movements as a non-invasive measure of respiratory effort during sleep: application in clinical practice.Frontiers in sleep · 2023Review
- Mandibular Movements are a Reliable Noninvasive Alternative to Esophageal Pressure for Measuring Respiratory Effort in Patients with Sleep Apnea Syndrome.Nature and science of sleep · 2022Article
- Immediate Physiological Responses to Inspiratory Flow Limited Events in Mild Obstructive Sleep Apnea.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2022Article
- Observational
- Quantification of airway conductance from noninvasive ventilatory drive in patients with sleep apnea.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2021Article
- Article
- Flow limitation/obstruction with recovery breath (FLOW) event for improved scoring of mild obstructive sleep apnea without electroencephalography.Sleep medicine · 2020Article
- Quantifying the magnitude of pharyngeal obstruction during sleep using airflow shape.The European respiratory journal · 2019Article
- Pulse transit time in pregnancy: a new way to diagnose and classify sleep disordered breathing?Sleep · 2019Article
- Airflow limitation in a collapsible model of the human pharynx: physical mechanisms studied with fluid-structure interaction simulations and experiments.Physiological reports · 2019Article
- Retropalatal and retroglossal airway compliance in patients with obstructive sleep apnea.Respiratory physiology & neurobiology · 2018Article
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
This report summarizes the proceedings of the American Thoracic Society Workshop on the Noninvasive Identification of Inspiratory Flow Limitation in Sleep Studies held on May 16, 2015, in Denver, Colorado. The goal of the workshop was to discuss methods for standardizing the scoring of flow limitation from nasal cannula pressure tracings. The workshop began with presentations on the physiology underlying flow limitation, existing methods of scoring flow limitation, the effects of signal acquisition and filtering on flow shapes, and a review of the literature examining the adverse outcomes related to flow limitation. After these presentations, the results from online scoring exercises, which were crowdsourced to workshop participants in advance of the workshop, were reviewed and discussed. Break-out sessions were then held to discuss potential algorithms for scoring flow limitation. Based on these discussions, subsequent online scoring exercises, and webinars after the workshop, a consensus-based set of recommendations for a scoring algorithm for flow limitation was developed. Key conclusions from the workshop were: (1) a standardized and automated approach to scoring flow limitation is needed to provide a metric of nonepisodic elevated upper airway resistance, which can then be related to clinical outcomes in large cohorts and patient groups; (2) at this time, the most feasible method for standardization is by proposing a consensus-based framework, which includes scoring rules, developed by experts (3) hardware and software settings of acquisition devices, including filter settings, affect the shape of the flow curve, and should be clearly specified; and (4) a priority for future research is the generation of an open-source, expert-derived training set to encourage and support validation of automated flow limitation scoring algorithms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.