Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28665336›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2017

Factors that Influence Intake to One Municipal Animal Control Facility in Florida: A Qualitative Study.

Terry Spencer, Linda Behar-Horenstein, Joe Aufmuth, Nancy Hardt, Jennifer W Applebaum, Amber Emanuel, Natalie Isaza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Beyond diversity: A One Health approach to equity, diversity, and inclusion in the animal health workforce.The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Terry SpencerCollege of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA. tspencer@ufl.edu.
Linda Behar-HorensteinColleges of Dentistry, Education, Veterinary Medicine, & Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA. Lsbhoren@ufl.edu.
Joe AufmuthGeorge A. Smathers Libraries, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA. mapper@uflib.ufl.edu.
Nancy HardtCollege of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA. nhardt@gmail.com.
Jennifer W ApplebaumCollege of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA. jennyapplebaum@ufl.edu.
Amber EmanuelCollege of Health & Human Performance, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA. amberemanuel@ufl.edu.
Natalie IsazaCollege of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA. isazan@ufl.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This qualitative study identified a study area by visualizing one year of animal intake from a municipal animal shelter on geographic information systems (GIS) maps to select an area of high stray-dog intake to investigate. Researchers conducted semi-structured interviews with residents of the selected study area to elucidate why there were high numbers of stray dogs coming from this location. Using grounded theory, three themes emerged from the interviews: concerns, attitudes, and disparities. The residents expressed concerns about animal welfare, personal safety, money, and health. They held various attitudes toward domestic animals in the community, including viewing them as pets, pests, or useful commodities (products). Residents expressed acceptance as well as some anger and fear about the situation in their community. Interviewees revealed they faced multiple socioeconomic disparities related to poverty. Pet abandonment can result when pet owners must prioritize human needs over animal needs, leading to increased shelter intake of stray dogs. Community-specific strategies for reducing local animal shelter intake should address the issue of pet abandonment by simultaneously targeting veterinary needs of animals, socioeconomic needs of residents, and respecting attitude differences between residents and shelter professionals.

Indexed as

animal sheltersGIS mappinggrounded theorypet abandonmentsocioeconomic disparities

Identifiers

PMID28665336
PMCPMC5532563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.