Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28665229›Full record

ArticleThe journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society2017

The Importance of Epitope Density in Selecting a Sensitive Positive IHC Control.

Kodela Vani, Seshi R Sompuram, Anika K Schaedle, Anuradha Balasubramanian, Monika Pilichowska, Stephen Naber, Jeffrey D Goldsmith, Kueikwun G Chang, Farzad Noubary, Steven A Bogen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A Consortium for Analytic Standardization in Immunohistochemistry.Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Synthetic Antigen Gels as Practical Controls for Standardized and Quantitative Immunohistochemistry.The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society · 2019
    Article
  9. A Root Cause Analysis Into the High Error Rate in Clinical Immunohistochemistry.Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kodela VaniMedical Discovery Partners LLC, Boston, Massachusetts (KV, SRS, AKS, AB, SAB).
Seshi R SompuramMedical Discovery Partners LLC, Boston, Massachusetts (KV, SRS, AKS, AB, SAB).
Anika K SchaedleMedical Discovery Partners LLC, Boston, Massachusetts (KV, SRS, AKS, AB, SAB).
Anuradha BalasubramanianMedical Discovery Partners LLC, Boston, Massachusetts (KV, SRS, AKS, AB, SAB).
Monika PilichowskaThe Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine (MP, SN, SAB), Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Stephen NaberThe Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine (MP, SN, SAB), Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jeffrey D GoldsmithThe Department of Pathology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (JDG).
Kueikwun G ChangThe Department of Pathology, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts (KGC).
Farzad NoubaryThe Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies (FN), Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Steven A BogenMedical Discovery Partners LLC, Boston, Massachusetts (KV, SRS, AKS, AB, SAB).

Funding

Tufts Clinical and Translational Research InstituteUL1TR001064 · NCATS · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI SELKER, HARRY P. · 2013 to 2017
$26.4M
Regulatory Validation of Standardized Clinical Laboratory Immunohistochemistry ControlsR44CA213476 · NCI · BOSTON CELL STANDARDS INC · PI BOGEN, STEVEN A · 2017 to 2018
$1.5M
Regulatory Validation of Standardized Clinical Immunohistochemistry ControlsR44CA183203 · NCI · BOSTON CELL STANDARDS INC · PI BOGEN, STEVEN A · 2014 to 2016
$1.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001064NCI NIH HHS R44 CA183203NCI NIH HHS R44 CA213476
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical Immunohistochemistry (IHC) laboratories face unique challenges in performing accurate and reproducible immunostains. Among these challenges is the use of homemade controls derived from pathological discard samples. Such positive controls have an unknown number of analyte molecules per cell (epitope density). It is unclear how the lack of defined analyte concentrations affects performance of the control. To address this question, we prepared positive IHC controls ( IHControls) for human epidermal growth factor receptor type II (HER-2), estrogen receptor (ER), or progesterone receptor (PR) with well-defined, homogeneous, and reproducible analyte concentrations. Using the IHControls, we examined the effect of analyte concentration on IHC control sensitivity. IHControls and conventional tissue controls were evaluated in a series of simulated primary antibody reagent degradation experiments. The data demonstrate that the ability of a positive IHC control to reveal reagent degradation depends on (1) the analyte concentration in the control and (2) where that concentration falls on the immunostain's analytic response curve. The most sensitive positive IHC controls have analyte concentrations within or close to the immunostain's concentration-dependent response range. Strongly staining positive controls having analyte concentrations on the analytic response curve plateau are less sensitive. These findings emphasize the importance of selecting positive IHC controls that are of intermediate (rather than strong) stain intensity.

Indexed as

EpitopesEndometriumErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneReference StandardsSensitivity and SpecificityEpitopesERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneIHControlimmunohistochemistrypeptidepositive control

Identifiers

PMID28665229
PMCPMC5533270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.