Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28664940›Full record

ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2017

Clinical implications of cytogenetic heterogeneity in multiple myeloma patients with TP53 deletion.

Suyang Hao, Pei Lin, L Jeffrey Medeiros, Lianghua Fang, Adrian A Carballo-Zarate, Sergej N Konoplev, Rachel L Sargent, Donna M Weber, Sheeba K Thomas, Elisabet E Manasanch and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The survival impact of CKS1B gains or amplification is dependent on the background karyotype and TP53 deletion status in patients with myeloma.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Suyang HaoDepartment of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston, Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
Pei LinDepartment of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
L Jeffrey MedeirosDepartment of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Lianghua FangDepartment of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Adrian A Carballo-ZarateDepartment of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Sergej N KonoplevDepartment of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Rachel L SargentDepartment of Clinical Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Donna M WeberDepartment of Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Sheeba K ThomasDepartment of Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Elisabet E ManasanchDepartment of Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Robert Z OrlowskiDepartment of Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Xinyan LuDepartment of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USHospital of the University of Pennsylvania · USHouston Methodist · USJiangsu Province Hospital · CNNorthwestern University · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
SWOG - Foreign Accrual under UMiU10CA032102 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BLANKE, CHARLES D. · 1985 to 2013
$141.3M
P4 -TARGETING MULTIPLE MYELOMA BY COMBINING CDK INHIBITORS AND BCL-2 ANTAGONISTSP50CA142509 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI KWAK, LARRY W · 2010 to 2014
$11.1M
Role of TJP1 in Sensitivity and Resistance to Proteasome Inhibitors in MyelomaR01CA184464 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI ORLOWSKI, ROBERT ZYGMUNT · 2015 to 2019
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS P50 CA142509NCI NIH HHS R01 CA184464NCI NIH HHS U10 CA032102
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

TP53 deletion (ΔTP53) in myeloma is known to be a high-risk finding associated with poorer prognosis. The prognostic impact of underlying cytogenetic heterogeneity in patients with myeloma associated with ΔTP53 is unknown. We studied 90 patients with myeloma associated with ΔTP53 identified by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization and assessed the impact of karyotype and coexisting alterations of IGH, RB1, and CKS1B. There were 54 men and 36 women with a median age of 59 years (range 38-84); 14 patients had a normal karyotype (NK/ΔTP53), 73 had a complex karyotype (CK/ΔTP53), and 3 had a non-complex abnormal karyotype. Patients with CK/ΔTP53 showed a significantly poorer overall survival compared with patients with NK/ΔTP53 (P=0.0243). Furthermore, in the CK/ΔTP53 group, patients with IGH rearrangement other than t(11;14)(q13;q32)/CCND1-IGH, designated as adverse-IGH, had an even worse outcome (P=0.0045). In contrast, RB1 deletion, CKS1B gain, ploidy, additional chromosome 17 abnormalities, or ΔTP53 clone size did not impact prognosis. Stem cell transplant did not improve overall survival in either the NK/ΔTP53 or CK/ΔTP53 (P=0.8810 and P=0.1006) groups, but tandem stem cell transplant did improve the overall survival of patients with CK/ΔTP53 (P=0.0067). Multivariate analysis confirmed in this cohort that complex karyotype (hazard ratio 1.976, 95% CI 1.022-3.821, P=0.043), adverse-IGH (hazard ratio 3.126, 95% CI 1.192-8.196, P=0.020), and tandem stem cell transplant independently correlate with overall survival (hazard ratio 0.281, 95% CI 0.091-0.866, P=0.027). We conclude that comprehensive genetic assessment adds to TP53 status in the risk stratification of myeloma patients.

Indexed as

Abnormal KaryotypeAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGene DeletionHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedMultiple MyelomaPrognosisRetrospective StudiesTumor Suppressor Protein p53TP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID28664940
PMCPMC5628266
OpenAlexW2732716672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.