Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28664519›Full record

ArticleJournal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea)2017

Poly-γ-glutamic acid productivity of Bacillus subtilis BsE1 has positive function in motility and biocontrol against Fusarium graminearum.

Luyao Wang, Ning Wang, Dandan Mi, Yuming Luo, Jianhua Guo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Harnessing NativeApplied and environmental microbiology · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. γ-Polyglutamic Acid Production, Biocontrol, and Stress Tolerance: Multifunction ofInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Plant Root Exudates Are Involved inFrontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Luyao WangDepartment of Plant Pathology, College of Plant Protection, Nanjing Agricultural University; Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Regional Modern Agriculture and Environmental Protection; Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Crop Diseases and Pests (Nanjing Agricultural University), Ministry of Education, Nanjing, 210095, P. R. China.
Ning WangDepartment of Plant Pathology, College of Plant Protection, Nanjing Agricultural University; Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Regional Modern Agriculture and Environmental Protection; Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Crop Diseases and Pests (Nanjing Agricultural University), Ministry of Education, Nanjing, 210095, P. R. China.
Dandan MiDepartment of Plant Pathology, College of Plant Protection, Nanjing Agricultural University; Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Regional Modern Agriculture and Environmental Protection; Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Crop Diseases and Pests (Nanjing Agricultural University), Ministry of Education, Nanjing, 210095, P. R. China.
Yuming LuoJiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Regional Modern Agriculture and Environmental Protection, Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Eco-Agricultural Biotechnology around Hongze Lake, School of Life Science, Huaiyin Normal University, Huaian, 223300, P. R. China. yumingluo@163.com.
Jianhua GuoDepartment of Plant Pathology, College of Plant Protection, Nanjing Agricultural University; Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Regional Modern Agriculture and Environmental Protection; Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Crop Diseases and Pests (Nanjing Agricultural University), Ministry of Education, Nanjing, 210095, P. R. China. jhguo@njau.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we investigate the relationship between γ-PGA productivity and biocontrol capacity of Bacillus subtilis BsE1; one bacterial isolate displayed 62.14% biocontrol efficacy against Fusarium root rot. The γ-PGA yield assay, motility assay, wheat root colonization assay, and biological control assay were analysed in different γ-PGA yield mutants of BsE1. The pgsB (PGA-synthase-CapB gene) deleted mutant of BsE1 reduced γ-PGA yield and exhibited apparent decline of in vitro motile ability. Deletion of pgsB impaired colonizing capacity of BsE1 on wheat root in 30 days, also lowered biocontrol efficacies from 62.08% (wild type BsE1) to 14.22% in greenhouse experiment against Fusarium root rot. The knockout of pgdS and ggt (genes relate to two γ-PGA degrading enzymes) on BsE1, leads to a considerable improvement in polymer yield and biocontrol efficacy, which attains higher level compared with wild type BsE1. Compared with ΔpgsB mutant, defense genes related to reactive oxygen species (ROS) and phytoalexin expressed changes by notable levels on wheat roots treated with BsE1, demonstrating the functional role γ-PGA plays in biocontrol against Fusarium root rot. γ-PGA is not only important to the motile and plant root colonization ability of BsE1, but also essential to the biological control performed by BsE1 against Fusarium root rot. Our goal in this study is to reveals a new perspective of BCAs screening on bacterial isolates, without good performance during pre-assays of antagonism ability.

Indexed as

AntibiosisBacillus subtilisBiological Control AgentsFusariumGenes, BacterialMovementPhytoalexinsPlant DiseasesPlant RootsPolyglutamic AcidReactive Oxygen SpeciesSesquiterpenesTriticumBiological Control AgentsPhytoalexinspoly(gamma-glutamic acid)Polyglutamic AcidReactive Oxygen SpeciesSesquiterpenesbiocontrolFusarium root rotmotilitypoly-γ-glutamic acidroot colonization

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.