Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28664443›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2018

Vacuum-assisted early transanal closure of leaking low colorectal anastomoses: the CLEAN study.

W A A Borstlap, G D Musters, L P S Stassen, H L van Westreenen, D Hess, S van Dieren, S Festen, E J van der Zaag, P J Tanis, W A Bemelman

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Management of acute and chronic pelvic sepsis after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer-a 10-year experience of a national referral centre.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2024
    Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

W A A BorstlapDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. w.a.borstlap@amc.uva.nl.
G D MustersDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
L P S StassenDepartment of Surgery, Academic Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
H L van WestreenenDepartment of Surgery, Isala Klinieken, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
D HessDepartment of Surgery, Antonius Zorggroep, Sneek, The Netherlands.
S van DierenDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
S FestenDepartment of Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
E J van der ZaagDepartment of Surgery, Gelre Ziekenhuis, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands.
P J TanisDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
W A BemelmanDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Academic Medical Center · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NLGelre Hospitals · NLIsala · NLMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLOLVG · NLSt. Antonius Ziekenhuis · NL

Funding

Achmea Z420
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNon-healing of anastomotic leakage can be observed in up to 50% after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. This study investigates the efficacy of early transanal closure of anastomotic leakage after pre-treatment with the Endosponge

methodsIn this prospective, multicentre, feasibility study, transanal suturing of the anastomotic defect was performed after vacuum-assisted cleaning of the presacral cavity. Primary outcome was the proportion of patients with a healed anastomosis at 6 months after transanal closure. Secondary, healing at last follow-up, continuity, direct medical costs, functionality and quality of life were analysed.

resultsBetween July 2013 and July 2015, 30 rectal cancer patients with a leaking low colorectal anastomosis were included, of whom 22 underwent neoadjuvant radiotherapy. Median follow-up was 14 (7-29) months. At 6 months, the anastomosis had healed in 16 (53%) patients. At last follow-up, anastomotic integrity was found in 21 (70%) and continuity was restored in 20 (67%) patients. Non-healing at 12 months was observed in 10/29 (34%) patients overall, and in 3/14 (21%) when therapy started within three weeks following the index operation. Major LARS was reported in 12/15 (80%) patients. The direct medical costs were €8933 (95% CI 7268-10,707) per patient.

conclusionVacuum-assisted early transanal closure of a leaking anastomosis after total mesorectal excision with 73% preoperative radiotherapy showed that acceptable anastomotic healing rates and stoma reversal rates can be achieved. Early diagnosis and start of treatment seems crucial.

Indexed as

Suture TechniquesAdultAgedAnastomosis, SurgicalAnastomotic LeakColonFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNegative-Pressure Wound TherapyNeoadjuvant TherapyProspective StudiesQuality of LifeRadiotherapy, AdjuvantAnastomotic leakageRectal cancerTransanal closureVacuum therapy

Identifiers

PMID28664443
PMCPMC5770507
OpenAlexW2732026357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.