Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28664434›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2018

Clinical outcomes five years after POEM for treatment of primary esophageal motility disorders.

Ezra N Teitelbaum, Christy M Dunst, Kevin M Reavis, Ahmed M Sharata, Marc A Ward, Steven R DeMeester, Lee L Swanström

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
13.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 153 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Tension pneumoperitoneum combined with COFrontiers in medicine · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. [Interventional endoscopy in gastroenterology].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ezra N TeitelbaumProvidence Cancer Center, Providence Portland Medical Center, Portland, OR, USA.
Christy M DunstProvidence Cancer Center, Providence Portland Medical Center, Portland, OR, USA.
Kevin M ReavisProvidence Cancer Center, Providence Portland Medical Center, Portland, OR, USA.
Ahmed M SharataGastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery Division, The Oregon Clinic, Portland, OR, USA.
Marc A WardProvidence Cancer Center, Providence Portland Medical Center, Portland, OR, USA.
Steven R DeMeesterProvidence Cancer Center, Providence Portland Medical Center, Portland, OR, USA.
Lee L SwanströmProvidence Cancer Center, Providence Portland Medical Center, Portland, OR, USA. lswanstrom@gmail.com.
Oregon Clinic · USProvidence Portland Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a novel operation for the treatment of achalasia and other esophageal motility disorders. While POEM has shown excellent short-term safety and efficacy, the long-term symptomatic outcomes after the procedure are unknown.

methodsPatients from a single center that underwent POEM for treatment of esophageal motility orders and were greater than 5 years removed from their operation were studied. Patients were contacted to assess current symptoms and encouraged to undergo repeat endoscopy for objective follow-up.

resultsThirty-six patients underwent POEM from October, 2010 to February, 2012 and current symptom scores were obtained from 29 patients at median 65-month follow-up. In the 23 patients with achalasia, Eckardt scores were significantly improved from preoperative baseline (mean current 1.7 vs. preoperative 6.4, p < 0.001). Nineteen patients (83%) with achalasia had a symptomatic success (Eckardt ≤3) and none required retreatment for symptoms. Eckardt scores were dramatically improved at 6 months and maintained at 2 years; however, there was a small but significant worsening of symptoms between 2 and 5-years. Of the five patients with EGJ outflow obstruction, all had current Eckardt scores ≤3 but two needed reintervention for persistent or recurrent symptoms, one with a laparoscopic Heller myotomy and another with an endoscopic cricomyotomy and proximal esophageal myotomy extension. At 6-month follow-up, repeat manometry showed decreased EGJ relaxation pressures and esophagram demonstrated improved emptying. 24-h pH monitoring showed abnormal distal esophageal acid exposure in 38% of patients. Fifteen patients underwent endoscopy at 5-years, revealing erosive esophagitis in two (13%), new hiatal hernia in two, and new non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus in one. The patient with Barrett's underwent a subsequent laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair and Toupet fundoplication.

conclusionsPOEM resulted in a successful palliation of symptoms in the majority of patients after 5 years, though these results emphasize the importance of long-term follow-up in all patients.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overEsophageal Motility DisordersEsophageal Sphincter, LowerFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGastroscopyHeller MyotomyHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedMouthNatural Orifice Endoscopic SurgerySeverity of Illness IndexAchalasiaEndoscopic pneumatic dilationEndoscopic surgeryEsophageal motilityLaparoscopic Heller myotomyPeroral endoscopic myotomyPOEM

Identifiers

PMID28664434
OpenAlexW2733588841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.