Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28664240›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2017

Understanding patients' preferences for surgical management of urethral stricture disease.

Lindsay A Hampson, Tracy K Lin, Leslie Wilson, Isabel E Allen, Thomas W Gaither, Benjamin N Breyer

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lindsay A HampsonDepartment of Urology, UCSF School of Medicine, 400 Parnassus Ave, A638, Box 0738, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA. Lindsay.Hampson@ucsf.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0740-7984
Tracy K LinDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, UCSF School of Pharmacy, San Francisco, USA.
Leslie WilsonDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, UCSF School of Pharmacy, San Francisco, USA.
Isabel E AllenDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, UCSF School of Medicine, San Francisco, USA.
Thomas W GaitherUCSF School of Medicine, San Francisco, USA.
Benjamin N BreyerDepartment of Urology, UCSF School of Medicine, 400 Parnassus Ave, A638, Box 0738, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
University of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of San Francisco · US

Funding

UCSF KURe Career Development ProgramK12DK083021 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BASKIN, LAURENCE, CARROLL, PETER R · 2008 to 2017
$5.9M
NIDDK NIH HHS K12 DK083021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo understand how prioritization of treatment attributes and treatment choice varies by patient characteristics, we sought to specifically determine how demographic variables affect patient treatment preference. PATIENTS AND

methodsMale patients with urethral stricture disease participated in a choice-based conjoint (CBC) analysis exercise evaluating six treatment attributes associated with internal urethrotomy and urethroplasty. Demographic and past symptom data were collected. Stratified analysis of demographic variables, including age, education, income, was conducted using a mixed effect logistic regression model to evaluate the coefficient size and confidence intervals between the treatments attribute preferences of each strata.

results169 patients completed the CBC exercise and were included in our analysis. Overall success of the procedure is the most important treatment attribute to patients and this persists across strata. Older patients (≥65) express preferences for better success rates and fewer future procedures, whereas younger patients prefer a less invasive approach and are more willing to accept additional procedures if needed. Patients with lower levels of education preferred open reconstruction and had a stronger preference against multiple future procedures, whereas those with higher levels of education preferred endoscopic treatment and had a less strong preference against multiple future procedures. Low-income individuals express statistically significant stronger negative preferences against high copay costs compared to high-income individuals.

conclusionThese results can help to inform physicians' counseling about surgical management of urethral stricture disease to better align patient preferences with treatment selection and encourage shared decision making.

Indexed as

Decision MakingPatient PreferenceAdultAgedAge FactorsChoice BehaviorCost SharingEducational StatusEndoscopyHealth ExpendituresHumansIncomeLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPovertyAge factorsDecision makingPatient preferenceSocioeconomic factorsUrethral stricture

Identifiers

PMID28664240
PMCPMC6452859
OpenAlexW2732261822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.