Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28664072›Full record

ReviewIntegrative medicine research2014

Green tea and type 2 diabetes.

Jae-Hyung Park, Jae-Hoon Bae, Sung-Soon Im, Dae-Kyu Song

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Integrative medicine research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Effect ofPreventive nutrition and food science · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Regenerative medicine of pancreatic islets.World journal of gastroenterology · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Phytotherapy in the Management of Diabetes: A Review.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jae-Hyung ParkDepartment of Physiology, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
Jae-Hoon BaeDepartment of Physiology, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
Sung-Soon ImDepartment of Physiology, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
Dae-Kyu SongDepartment of Physiology, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
Keimyung University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Green tea and coffee consumption have been widely popular worldwide. These beverages contain caffeine to activate the central nervous system by adenosine receptor blockade, and due to the caffeine, addiction or tolerance may occur. In addition to this caffeine effect, green tea and coffee consumption have always been at the center of discussions about human health, disease, and longevity. In particular, green tea catechins are involved in many biological activities such as antioxidation and modulation of various cellular lipid and proteins. Thus, they are beneficial against degenerative diseases, including obesity, cancer, cardiovascular diseases, and various inflammatory diseases. Some reports also suggest that daily consumption of tea catechins may help in controlling type 2 diabetes. However, other studies have reported that chronic consumption of green tea may result in hepatic failure, neuronal damage, and exacerbation of diabetes, suggesting that interindividual variations in the green tea effect are large. This review will focus on the effect of green tea catechins extracted from the

Indexed as

catechinsglucose uptakegreen teaobesitytype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID28664072
PMCPMC5481694
OpenAlexW2147336224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.