Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28663909›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2017

The value of polarization in camera-based photoplethysmography.

Alexander Trumpp, Philipp L Bauer, Stefan Rasche, Hagen Malberg, Sebastian Zaunseder

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexander TrumppInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Technische Universität Dresden, 01062 Dresden, Germany.
Philipp L BauerInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Technische Universität Dresden, 01062 Dresden, Germany.
Stefan RascheHerzzentrum Dresden, Department of Cardiac Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01062 Dresden, Germany.
Hagen MalbergInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Technische Universität Dresden, 01062 Dresden, Germany.
Sebastian ZaunsederInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Technische Universität Dresden, 01062 Dresden, Germany.
TU Dresden · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Camera-based photoplethysmography (cbPPG) is a novel measuring technique that permits the remote acquisition of cardiovascular signals using video cameras. Research still lacks in fundamental studies to reach a deeper technical and physiological understanding. This work analyzes the employment of polarization filtration to (i) assess the gain for the signal quality and (ii) draw conclusions about the cbPPG signal's origin. We evaluated various forehead regions of 18 recordings with different color and filter settings. Our results prove that for an optimal illumination, the perpendicular filter setting provides a significant benefit. The outcome supports the theory that signals arise from blood volume changes. For lateral illumination, ballistocardiographic effects dominate the signal as polarization's impact vanishes.

Indexed as

(170.3660) Light propagation in tissues(170.3880) Medical and biological imaging(280.0280) Remote sensing and sensors

Identifiers

PMID28663909
PMCPMC5480432
OpenAlexW2611340245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.