ArticleBiomedical optics express2017
Design and evaluation of a compound acoustic lens for photoacoustic computed tomography.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Progress of clinical translation of handheld and semi-handheld photoacoustic imaging.Photoacoustics · 2021Review
- Looking at sound: optoacoustics with all-optical ultrasound detection.Light, science & applications · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In photoacoustic computed tomography, the limited directivity of the detectors may cause deformation of off-center targets and lead to an imbalanced resolution in the imaging area. To improve the directivity of the acoustic detectors, several negative acoustic lenses have been proposed. In this study, we develop a new compound acoustic lens fabricated by integrating a concave polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) lens and a convex epoxy lens. Both theoretical simulations and experimental evaluations demonstrate that the compound lens provides a larger directivity compared to single lenses made of PDMS, epoxy, and liquid. The measured acceptance angles of a 6-mm piezoelectric acoustic transducer equipped with the compound, epoxy, liquid, and PDMS lenses are 55°, 36°, 25°, and 20°, respectively. No deformation is observed in the off-center targets by using compound lens. However, serious deformation appears in the cases using single lenses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.