Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28663897›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2017

Intravascular optical coherence tomography [Invited].

Brett E Bouma, Martin Villiger, Kenichiro Otsuka, Wang-Yuhl Oh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Aging of deep venous thrombosisBiomedical optics express · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Intravascular optical coherence elastography.Biomedical optics express · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. A review of low-cost and portable optical coherence tomography.Progress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England) · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Brett E BoumaHarvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02171, USA.
Martin VilligerHarvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02171, USA.
Kenichiro OtsukaHarvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02171, USA.
Wang-Yuhl OhDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, KAIST, 291 Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, South Korea.

Funding

TRD3: Percutaneous and Interstitial ImagingP41EB015903 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Jacqueline Namati · 2012 to 2026
$22.4M
Intracoronary imaging of plaque collagen in patientsR01HL119065 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BOUMA, BRETT E, NADKARNI, SEEMANTINI K · 2014 to 2017
$3.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL119065NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015903
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shortly after the first demonstration of optical coherence tomography for imaging the microstructure of the human eye, work began on developing systems and catheters suitable for intravascular imaging in order to diagnose and investigate atherosclerosis and potentially to monitor therapy. This review covers the driving considerations of the clinical application and its constraints, the major engineering milestones that enabled the current, high-performance commercial imaging systems, the key studies that laid the groundwork for image interpretation, and the clinical research that traces intravascular optical coherence tomography (OCT) from early human pilot studies to current clinical trials.

Indexed as

(170.3880) Medical and biological imaging(170.4500) Optical coherence tomography

Identifiers

PMID28663897
PMCPMC5480504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.