Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28663873›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2017

Autofluorescence imaging captures heterogeneous drug response differences between 2D and 3D breast cancer cultures.

T M Cannon, A T Shah, M C Skala

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

T M CannonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Station B, Box 1631, Nashville, TN 37235, USA.
A T ShahDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Station B, Box 1631, Nashville, TN 37235, USA.
M C SkalaMorgridge Institute for Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 330 North Orchard Street, Madison, WI 53715, USA.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

(PQ7) Quantitative in vivo optical imaging of tumor heterogeneityR01CA205101 · NCI · MORGRIDGE INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH, INC. · PI SKALA, MELISSA CAROLINE · 2016 to 2020
$1.9M
Cellular-level Optical Metabolic Imaging to Predict Drug Response in CancerR01CA185747 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI SKALA, MELISSA CAROLINE · 2014 to 2019
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA185747NCI NIH HHS R01 CA205101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two-photon microscopy of cellular autofluorescence intensity and lifetime (optical metabolic imaging, or OMI) is a promising tool for preclinical drug development. OMI, which exploits the endogenous fluorescence from the metabolic coenzymes NAD(P)H and FAD, is sensitive to changes in cell metabolism produced by drug treatment. Previous studies have shown that drug response, genetic expression, cell-cell communication, and cell signaling in 3D culture match those of the original

Indexed as

(170.1530) Cell analysis(170.1610) Clinical applications(180.2520) Fluorescence microscopy

Identifiers

PMID28663873
PMCPMC5480588
OpenAlexW2594828440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.