Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28663872›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2017

Lookup table-based sampling of the phase function for Monte Carlo simulations of light propagation in turbid media.

Peter Naglič, Franjo Pernuš, Boštjan Likar, Miran Bürmen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Peter NagličUniversity of Ljubljana, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Laboratory of Imaging Technologies, Tržaška cesta 25, SI-1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Franjo PernušUniversity of Ljubljana, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Laboratory of Imaging Technologies, Tržaška cesta 25, SI-1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Boštjan LikarUniversity of Ljubljana, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Laboratory of Imaging Technologies, Tržaška cesta 25, SI-1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Miran BürmenUniversity of Ljubljana, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Laboratory of Imaging Technologies, Tržaška cesta 25, SI-1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Analytical expressions for sampling the scattering angle from a phase function in Monte Carlo simulations of light propagation are available only for a limited number of phase functions. Consequently, numerical sampling methods based on tabulated values are often required instead. By using Monte Carlo simulated reflectance, we compare two existing and propose an improved numerical sampling method and show that both the number of the tabulated values and the numerical sampling method significantly influence the accuracy of the simulated reflectance. The provided results and guidelines should serve as a good starting point for conducting computationally efficient Monte Carlo simulations with numerical phase function sampling.

Indexed as

(170.3660) Light propagation in tissues(170.5280) Photon migration(170.7050) Turbid media

Identifiers

PMID28663872
PMCPMC5480587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.