ArticleBiomedical optics express2017
Endoscope field of view measurement.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- A 1.8 mm-Diameter Chip-on-Tip Endoscope with Integrated µLED Illumination for Narrow-Cavity Imaging.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Interpreting Modulation Transfer Function in Endoscopic Imaging: Spatial-Frequency Conversion Across Imaging Spaces and the Digital Image Domain with Case Studies.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Is 2D-augmented reality precise enough for middle ear endoscopic surgery?European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Article
- Best Practices for Measuring the Modulation Transfer Function of Video Endoscopes.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Ultra-miniature dual-wavelength spatial frequency domain imaging for micro-endoscopy.Journal of biomedical optics · 2024Article
- The Evolution of Spinal Endoscopy: Design and Image Analysis of a Single-Use Digital Endoscope Versus Traditional Optic Endoscope.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A Polymeric Piezoelectric Tactile Sensor Fabricated by 3D Printing and Laser Micromachining for Hardness Differentiation during Palpation.Micromachines · 2022Article
- USB capsule endoscope for retrograde imaging of the esophagus.Journal of biomedical optics · 2020Article
- Free-Form Deformation Approach for Registration of Visible and Infrared Facial Images in Fever Screening.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
- Electrically tunable fluidic lens imaging system for laparoscopic fluorescence-guided surgery.Biomedical optics express · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The current International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standard (ISO 8600-3: 1997 including Amendment 1: 2003) for determining endoscope field of view (FOV) does not accurately characterize some novel endoscopic technologies such as endoscopes with a close focus distance and capsule endoscopes. We evaluated the endoscope FOV measurement method (the FOV
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.