Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28663787›Full record

ArticleF1000Research2017

CyTOF workflow: differential discovery in high-throughput high-dimensional cytometry datasets.

Malgorzata Nowicka, Carsten Krieg, Helena L Crowell, Lukas M Weber, Felix J Hartmann, Silvia Guglietta, Burkhard Becher, Mitchell P Levesque, Mark D Robinson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in F1000Research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 350 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
350citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

350 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. IgA2Cell reports. Medicine · 2025
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Influence of polyfunctional TbetFrontiers in immunology · 2025
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Phase II Study of Eribulin plus Pembrolizumab in Metastatic Soft-tissue Sarcomas: Clinical Outcomes and Biological Correlates.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

290 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Malgorzata NowickaInstitute for Molecular Life Sciences, University of Zurich, Zurich, 8057, Switzerland.
Carsten KriegInstitute of Experimental Immunology, University of Zurich, Zurich, 8057, Switzerland.
Helena L CrowellInstitute for Molecular Life Sciences, University of Zurich, Zurich, 8057, Switzerland.
Lukas M WeberInstitute for Molecular Life Sciences, University of Zurich, Zurich, 8057, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3282-1730
Felix J HartmannInstitute of Experimental Immunology, University of Zurich, Zurich, 8057, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4174-2276
Silvia GugliettaDepartment of Experimental Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Via Adamello 16, Milan, I-20139, Italy.
Burkhard BecherInstitute of Experimental Immunology, University of Zurich, Zurich, 8057, Switzerland.
Mitchell P LevesqueDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, CH-8091, Switzerland.
Mark D RobinsonInstitute for Molecular Life Sciences, University of Zurich, Zurich, 8057, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3048-5518

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-dimensional mass and flow cytometry (HDCyto) experiments have become a method of choice for high-throughput interrogation and characterization of cell populations. Here, we present an updated R-based pipeline for differential analyses of HDCyto data, largely based on Bioconductor packages. We computationally define cell populations using FlowSOM clustering, and facilitate an optional but reproducible strategy for manual merging of algorithm-generated clusters. Our workflow offers different analysis paths, including association of cell type abundance with a phenotype or changes in signalling markers within specific subpopulations, or differential analyses of aggregated signals. Importantly, the differential analyses we show are based on regression frameworks where the HDCyto data is the response; thus, we are able to model arbitrary experimental designs, such as those with batch effects, paired designs and so on. In particular, we apply generalized linear mixed models or linear mixed models to analyses of cell population abundance or cell-population-specific analyses of signaling markers, allowing overdispersion in cell count or aggregated signals across samples to be appropriately modeled. To support the formal statistical analyses, we encourage exploratory data analysis at every step, including quality control (e.g., multi-dimensional scaling plots), reporting of clustering results (dimensionality reduction, heatmaps with dendrograms) and differential analyses (e.g., plots of aggregated signals).

Indexed as

CyTOFdifferential analysisflow cytometry

Identifiers

PMID28663787
PMCPMC5473464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.