ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2017
Who Deserves My Trust? Cue-Elicited Feedback Negativity Tracks Reputation Learning in Repeated Social Interactions.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of promotional and preventive framing strategies in AI generated content on neural responses and trust.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Beauty Is Not Always a Perk: The Role of Attractiveness and Social Interest in Trust Decisions.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Effects of maximum and minimum offers on reciprocity and trust perceptions during economic decision-making.Frontiers in cognition · 2025Article
- The Effect of Trustor Age and Trustee Age on Trustworthiness Judgments: An Event-Related Potential Study.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022Article
- Context-based interpersonal relationship modulates social comparison between outcomes: an event-related potential study.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2021Article
- How collective reward structure impedes group decision making: An experimental study using the HoneyComb paradigm.PloS one · 2021Article
- Outcome Evaluation Affects Facial Trustworthiness: An Event-Related Potential Study.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2020Article
- Outcome-Based Evaluations of Social Interaction Valence in a Contingent Response Context.Frontiers in psychology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Trust and trustworthiness contribute to reciprocal behavior and social relationship development. To make better decisions, people need to evaluate others' trustworthiness. They often assess this kind of reputation by learning through repeated social interactions. The present event-related potential (ERP) study explored the reputation learning process in a repeated trust game where subjects made multi-round decisions of investment to different partners. We found that subjects gradually learned to discriminate trustworthy partners from untrustworthy ones based on how often their partners reciprocated the investment, which was indicated by their own investment decisions. Besides, electrophysiological data showed that the faces of the untrustworthy partners induced larger feedback negativity (FN) amplitude than those of the trustworthy partners, but only in the late phase of the game. The ERP results corresponded with the behavioral pattern and revealed that the learned trustworthiness differentiation was coded by the cue-elicited FN component. Consistent with previous research, our findings suggest that the anterior cue-elicited FN reflects the reputation appraisal and tracks the reputation learning process in social interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.