ArticleAnesthesia, essays and researches
Comparison of Effect of Ephedrine and Priming on the Onset Time of Vecuronium.
Article in Anesthesia, essays and researches. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSuccinylcholine has been the neuromuscular blocking drug of choice for laryngoscopy and intubation, but it has several adverse effects. Nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking drugs are good alternative provided their onset of action is hastened. Priming technique and use of ephedrine or MgSO
aimsTo compare the effects of priming and ephedrine pretreatment on the onset time of intubating dose of vecuronium. SETTINGS AND
designA prospective, randomized comparative study was done at a state-owned tertiary care teaching hospital. MATERIALS AND
methodsAfter obtaining the Institutional Ethical Committee approval and written informed consent, sixty patients of either gender aged 18-60 years, the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status Class I/II, weighing 40-70 kg, were randomly divided into two groups of thirty each. Group E received 70 μg/kg ephedrine, and Group P received 0.01 mg/kg of vecuronium 3 min before intubating dose of vecuronium. Intubation was done after getting a train of four zero. Intubation time, clinical intubation grade using Cooper's scale, and hemodynamic parameters were noted. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Chi-square test and independent
resultsThe mean time for intubation in ephedrine group (E) was 104 ± 23.282 s and in the priming group (P), it was 142 ± 55.671 s (
conclusionPretreatment with ephedrine 70 μg/kg shortens the onset time of vecuronium for intubation and is superior to the priming technique. Low-dose ephedrine, when used along with propofol induction, provides hemodynamic stability during induction and intubation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.