Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28663264›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2017

New Ultrasound Measurements to Bridge the Gap between Prenatal and Neonatal Brain Growth Assessment.

I V Koning, J A Roelants, I A L Groenenberg, M J Vermeulen, S P Willemsen, I K M Reiss, P P Govaert, R P M Steegers-Theunissen, J Dudink

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Transvaginal ultrasound assessment of corpus callosal length in the fetus: multicenter cross-sectional study.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

I V KoningFrom the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (I.V.K., J.A.R., I.A.L.G., S.P.W., R.P.M.S.-T.), Division of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1626-089X
J A RoelantsFrom the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (I.V.K., J.A.R., I.A.L.G., S.P.W., R.P.M.S.-T.), Division of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6110-9398
I A L GroenenbergFrom the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (I.V.K., J.A.R., I.A.L.G., S.P.W., R.P.M.S.-T.), Division of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4938-4784
M J VermeulenDepartment of Pediatrics (I.V.K., J.A.R., M.J.V., I.K.M.R., P.P.G., R.P.M.S.-T., J.D.), Division of Neonatology, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9686-8186
S P WillemsenFrom the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (I.V.K., J.A.R., I.A.L.G., S.P.W., R.P.M.S.-T.), Division of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1675-2931
I K M ReissDepartment of Pediatrics (I.V.K., J.A.R., M.J.V., I.K.M.R., P.P.G., R.P.M.S.-T., J.D.), Division of Neonatology, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9474-6895
P P GovaertDepartment of Pediatrics (I.V.K., J.A.R., M.J.V., I.K.M.R., P.P.G., R.P.M.S.-T., J.D.), Division of Neonatology, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6819-7343
R P M Steegers-TheunissenFrom the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (I.V.K., J.A.R., I.A.L.G., S.P.W., R.P.M.S.-T.), Division of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4353-5756
J DudinkDepartment of Pediatrics (I.V.K., J.A.R., M.J.V., I.K.M.R., P.P.G., R.P.M.S.-T., J.D.), Division of Neonatology, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands j.dudink@umcutrecht.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0446-3646
Erasmus MC - Sophia Children’s Hospital · NLErasmus MC · NLS.P.E.C.I.E.S. · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeMost ultrasound markers for monitoring brain growth can only be used in either the prenatal or the postnatal period. We investigated whether corpus callosum length and corpus callosum-fastigium length could be used as markers for both prenatal and postnatal brain growth. MATERIALS AND

methodsA 3D ultrasound study embedded in the prospective Rotterdam Periconception Cohort was performed at 22, 26 and 32 weeks' gestational age in fetuses with fetal growth restriction, congenital heart defects, and controls. Postnatally, cranial ultrasound was performed at 42 weeks' postmenstrual age. First, reliability was evaluated. Second, associations between prenatal and postnatal corpus callosum and corpus callosum-fastigium length were investigated. Third, we created reference curves and compared corpus callosum and corpus callosum-fastigium length growth trajectories of controls with growth trajectories of fetuses with fetal growth retardation and congenital heart defects.

resultsWe included 199 fetuses; 22 with fetal growth retardation, 20 with congenital heart defects, and 157 controls. Reliability of both measurements was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient ≥ 0.97). Corpus callosum growth trajectories were significantly decreased in fetuses with fetal growth restriction and congenital heart defects (β = -2.295; 95% CI, -3.320-1.270;

conclusionsCorpus callosum and corpus callosum-fastigium length may serve as reliable markers for monitoring brain growth from the prenatal into the postnatal period. The clinical applicability of these markers was established by the significantly different corpus callosum and corpus callosum-fastigium growth trajectories in fetuses at risk for abnormal brain growth compared with those of controls.

Indexed as

BrainFemaleFetal Growth RetardationFetusGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornMalePregnancyProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsUltrasonography, Prenatal

Identifiers

PMID28663264
PMCPMC7963690
OpenAlexW2731887010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.