Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28662974›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2017

U.S. cannabis legalization and use of vaping and edible products among youth.

Jacob T Borodovsky, Dustin C Lee, Benjamin S Crosier, Joy L Gabrielli, James D Sargent, Alan J Budney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 84 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jacob T BorodovskyCenter for Technology and Behavioral Health Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, 46 Centerra Parkway, Lebanon, NH 03766, United States; The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, 74 College St., Hanover, NH 03755, United States. Electronic address: Jacob.t.borodovsky.gr@dartmouth.edu.
Dustin C LeeBehavioral Pharmacology Research Unit, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine 5510 Nathan Shock Drive, Baltimore, MD 21224-6823, United States.
Benjamin S CrosierCenter for Technology and Behavioral Health Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, 46 Centerra Parkway, Lebanon, NH 03766, United States.
Joy L GabrielliC. Everett Koop Institute, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Norris Cotton Cancer Center, One Medical Center Drive Lebanon, NH 03756, United States.
James D SargentC. Everett Koop Institute, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Norris Cotton Cancer Center, One Medical Center Drive Lebanon, NH 03756, United States.
Alan J BudneyCenter for Technology and Behavioral Health Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, 46 Centerra Parkway, Lebanon, NH 03766, United States.

Funding

Translational Engineering in Cancer (TEC)P30CA023108 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Steven D Leach · 1985 to 2026
$91.3M
Treatment Development & Evaluation CoreP30DA029926 · NIDA · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Lisa A. Marsch · 2011 to 2026
$21.5M
Training in the Science of Co-Occurring DisordersT32DA037202 · NIDA · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Lisa A. Marsch · 2014 to 2026
$4.7M
Targeting tobacco cessation during treatment for cannabis use disordersR01DA032243 · NIDA · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI BUDNEY, ALAN JEFFREY · 2012 to 2015
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023108NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA029926NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA032243NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA037202
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlternative methods for consuming cannabis (e.g., vaping and edibles) have become more popular in the wake of U.S. cannabis legalization. Specific provisions of legal cannabis laws (LCL) (e.g., dispensary regulations) may impact the likelihood that youth will use alternative methods and the age at which they first try the method - potentially magnifying or mitigating the developmental harms of cannabis use.

methodsThis study examined associations between LCL provisions and how youth consume cannabis. An online cannabis use survey was distributed using Facebook advertising, and data were collected from 2630 cannabis-using youth (ages 14-18). U.S. states were coded for LCL status and various LCL provisions. Regression analyses tested associations among lifetime use and age of onset of cannabis vaping and edibles and LCL provisions.

resultsLonger LCL duration (OR

conclusionSpecific provisions of LCL appear to impact the likelihood, and age at which, youth use alternative methods to consume cannabis. These methods may carry differential risks for initiation and escalation of cannabis use. Understanding associations between LCL provisions and methods of administration can inform the design of effective cannabis regulatory strategies.

Indexed as

Legislation, DrugAdolescentCannabisHumansLicensureMaleMarijuana SmokingMarijuana UseSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesVapingAdolescentCannabisEdiblesLegalizationMarijuanaVaping

Identifiers

PMID28662974
PMCPMC5534375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.