Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28662952›Full record

ArticleVaccine2017

Vaccination against histomonosis limits pronounced changes of B cells and T-cell subsets in turkeys and chickens.

Taniya Mitra, Wilhelm Gerner, Fana Alem Kidane, Patricia Wernsdorf, Michael Hess, Armin Saalmüller, Dieter Liebhart

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Identification and Characterization of α-Actinin 1 ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Histomonosis in Poultry: A Comprehensive Review.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Taniya MitraClinic for Poultry and Fish Medicine, Department for Farm Animals and Veterinary Public Health, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Austria.
Wilhelm GernerInstitute of Immunology, Department of Pathobiology, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Austria.
Fana Alem KidaneClinic for Poultry and Fish Medicine, Department for Farm Animals and Veterinary Public Health, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Austria.
Patricia WernsdorfClinic for Poultry and Fish Medicine, Department for Farm Animals and Veterinary Public Health, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Austria.
Michael HessClinic for Poultry and Fish Medicine, Department for Farm Animals and Veterinary Public Health, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Austria; Christian Doppler Laboratory for Innovative Poultry Vaccines (IPOV), University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Austria.
Armin SaalmüllerInstitute of Immunology, Department of Pathobiology, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Austria.
Dieter LiebhartClinic for Poultry and Fish Medicine, Department for Farm Animals and Veterinary Public Health, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Austria. Electronic address: dieter.liebhart@vetmeduni.ac.at.
University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna · AT

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 25054
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The protozoan parasite Histomonas meleagridis is the causative agent of histomonosis in gallinaceous birds. In turkeys, the disease can result in high mortality due to severe inflammation and necrosis in caecum and liver, whereas in chickens the disease is less severe. Recently, experimental vaccination was shown to protect chickens and turkeys against histomonosis but dynamics in the cellular immune response are not yet demonstrated. In the present work, different groups of birds of both species were vaccinated with attenuated, and/or infected with virulent histomonads. Flow cytometry was applied at different days post inoculation to analyse the absolute number of T-cell subsets and B cells in caecum, liver, spleen and blood, in order to monitor changes in these major lymphocyte subsets. In addition, in chicken samples total white blood cells were investigated. Infected turkeys showed a significant decrease of T cells in the caecum within one week post infection compared to control birds, whereas vaccination showed delayed changes. The challenge of vaccinated turkeys led to a significant increase of all investigated lymphocytes in the blood already at 4 DPI, indicating an effective and fast recall response of the primed immune system. In the caecum of chickens, changes of B cells, CD4

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimal StructuresBloodB-LymphocytesChickensFlow CytometryPoultry DiseasesProtozoan InfectionsProtozoan VaccinesT-Lymphocyte SubsetsTurkeysVaccines, AttenuatedProtozoan VaccinesVaccines, AttenuatedChickenHistomonas meleagridisHistomonosisImmune responseTurkeyVaccination

Identifiers

PMID28662952
PMCPMC5604733
OpenAlexW2693409766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.