Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28662720›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2017

A practical examination of RNA isolation methods for European pear (Pyrus communis).

Loren Honaas, Elena Kahn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. FirstFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Loren HonaasUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Physiology and Pathology of Tree Fruits Research Unit, Wenatchee, WA, 98801, USA. loren.honaas@ars.usda.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9187-8254
Elena KahnUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Physiology and Pathology of Tree Fruits Research Unit, Wenatchee, WA, 98801, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWith the goal of identifying fast, reliable, and broadly applicable RNA isolation methods in European pear fruit for downstream transcriptome analysis, we evaluated several commercially available kit-based RNA isolation methods, plus our modified version of a published cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB)-based method.

resultsWe confirmed previous work indicating chaotropic agent-based kits produced sufficient, high-quality RNA in freshly harvested, mature 'Bartlett' fruit. However, RNA isolation from 'd'Anjou' pear peel and especially cortical tissues of fruit stored for 11 months proved challenging to all but our modified CTAB-based method. Generally, more RNA was recovered from peel tissues than cortical tissues. Less toxic dithiothreitol was confirmed to be an acceptable reducing agent as its substitution for 2-mercaptoethanol often yielded high quality RNA. Finally, we present evidence that erroneous signals in the 5S region of Bioanalyzer RNA size plot histograms, that interfered with RNA integrity number calculation, were small RNA fragments that are reduced by simple cleanup procedures, not artifacts as previously reported.

Indexed as

CetrimoniumCetrimonium CompoundsDithiothreitolFruitMercaptoethanolPyrusQuality ControlReagent Kits, DiagnosticRNA, PlantTranscriptomeCetrimoniumCetrimonium CompoundsDithiothreitolMercaptoethanolReagent Kits, DiagnosticRNA, Plant2-mercaptoethanol‘Bartlett’BioanalyzerCetyl-trimethyl-ammonium-bromide‘d’Anjou’DithiothreitolPyrus communisRNARNA integrity number

Identifiers

PMID28662720
PMCPMC5492931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.