Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28662690›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2017

Comparative efficacy of a new spot-on combination product containing selamectin and sarolaner (Stronghold®Plus) versus fluralaner (Bravecto®) against induced infestations with Ixodes ricinus ticks on cats.

Thomas Geurden, Stasia Borowski, Magda Wozniakiewicz, Vickie King, Josephus Fourie, Julian Liebenberg

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Thomas GeurdenZoetis, Veterinary Medicine Research & Development, Mercuriusstraat 20, 1930, Zaventem, Belgium. thomas.geurden@zoetis.com.
Stasia BorowskiZoetis, Veterinary Medicine Research & Development, Mercuriusstraat 20, 1930, Zaventem, Belgium.
Magda WozniakiewiczZoetis, Veterinary Medicine Research & Development, Mercuriusstraat 20, 1930, Zaventem, Belgium.
Vickie KingZoetis, Veterinary Medicine Research & Development, Portage Road 333, Kalamazoo, MI, 49007, USA.
Josephus FourieClinvet, PO Box 11186, Universitas Bloemfontein, 9321, South Africa.
Julian LiebenbergClinvet, PO Box 11186, Universitas Bloemfontein, 9321, South Africa.
Zoetis (Belgium) · BEClinvet · ZAZoetis (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTicks are increasingly reported on cats worldwide, with Ixodes ricinus being a relevant species across Europe and in near by areas of North Africa and the Middle East. Yet there are few acaracidal products with proven efficacy approved for use in cats. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of a new spot-on formulation containing selamectin and sarolaner with a topical application of fluralaner (Bravecto®) against Ixodes ricinus ticks on cats. To that end, twenty-four (24) cats were randomly allocated to one of three treatment groups. The cats in the control group remained untreated. Cats in group 2 were treated with selamectin/sarolaner (Stronghold®Plus; Zoetis) at the minimum recommended dose of 1.0 mg/kg sarolaner and 6.0 mg/kg selamectin on Days 0, 30 and 60. The cats in group 3 received a fluralaner treatment (Bravecto®spot-on solution for cats, MSD) at the minimum recommended dose of 40.0 mg/kg on Day 0. Cats were infested with 50 (± 4) viable, adult, unfed I. ricinus ticks on Days 26, 54, 82 and 89 and ticks were removed for counting 48 h (± 2 h) later.

resultsThree monthly treatments with selamectin/sarolaner provided high and consistent efficacy against I. ricinus for the entire duration of the study period. In contrast, the efficacy of fluralaner declined in the second month after treatment and was below the efficacy threshold of 90% on Days 56, 84 and 91. The percentage efficacy against I. ricinus was numerically higher in the selemectin/sarolaner treated group than in the fluralaner-treated group on Days 56, 84 and 91. Furthermore, greasiness and spiking of the hair, as well as white deposits were frequently observed in the fluralaner-treated cats.

conclusionThe results of the present study confirm the high and consistent efficacy of a new spot-on combination product containing selamectin and sarolaner against I. ricinus in cats, and indicate a decline in fluralaner efficacy during the 91 day period after treatment.

Indexed as

Administration, TopicalAnimalsAntiparasitic AgentsAzetidinesCat DiseasesCatsDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleIsoxazolesIvermectinIxodesMaleSpiro CompoundsTick InfestationsA1443 compoundAntiparasitic AgentsAzetidinesIsoxazolesIvermectinsarolanerselamectinSpiro CompoundsApplicationCatsEfficacyFluralanerIxodes ricinusPersistentSarolanerSelamectin

Identifiers

PMID28662690
PMCPMC5492925
OpenAlexW2727844983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.