Reclassification of the Sacral Autonomic Outflow to Pelvic Organs as the Caudal Outpost of the Sympathetic System Is Misleading.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. The autonomic nervous system: Time for a conceptual reframing?The Journal of physiology · 2025
   Review
2. Subclinical lipopolysaccharide from Salmonella Enteritidis induces neuropeptide dysregulation in the spinal cord and the dorsal root ganglia.BMC neuroscience · 2019
   Article
3. The sacral autonomic outflow is parasympathetic: Langley got it right.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2018
   Review

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  The sacral autonomic outflow is sympathetic.2016
• Comment on
  Landmark Article Transforms Traditional View of the Autonomic Nervous System.2017

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as