Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28662509›Full record

Trial reportInternational archives of allergy and immunology2017

Preventing Hereditary Angioedema Attacks in Children Using Cinryze®: Interim Efficacy and Safety Phase 3 Findings.

Emel Aygören-Pürsün, Daniel Soteres, Dumitru Moldovan, Jim Christensen, Arthur Van Leerberghe, James Hao, Jennifer Schranz, Kraig W Jacobson, Inmaculada Martinez-Saguer

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International archives of allergy and immunology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02052141 (A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Single-Blind, Dose-Ranging, Crossover Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Intravenous Administration of CINRYZE®), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02052141 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Single-Blind, Dose-Ranging, Crossover Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Intravenous Administration of CINRYZE® (C1 Esterase Inhibitor [Human]) for the Prevention of Angioedema Attacks in Children 6 to 11 Years of Age With Hereditary Angioedema

TypeinterventionalSponsorShireRan2014 to 2017Enrolled12ConditionsHereditary Angioedema (HAE)ArmsCINRYZE 500, CINRYZE 1000
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. A randomized trial of human C1 inhibitor prophylaxis in children with hereditary angioedema.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2019
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. The International/Canadian Hereditary Angioedema Guideline.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2019
    Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Emel Aygören-PürsünDepartment for Children and Adolescents, Angioedema Centre, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.
Daniel Soteres
Dumitru Moldovan
Jim Christensen
Arthur Van Leerberghe
James Hao
Jennifer Schranz
Kraig W Jacobson
Inmaculada Martinez-Saguer
Takeda (United States) · USAllergy Associates Research Center · USGoethe University Frankfurt · DESpitalul Clinic Judetean Mures · ROSummit Health Institute for Research and Education · USSystems, Applications & Products in Data Processing (Germany) · DEUniversity of Colorado Colorado Springs · USUniversity of Nevada, Las Vegas · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare genetic disease causing unpredictable and potentially life-threatening subcutaneous and submucosal edematous attacks. Cinryze® (Shire ViroPharma Inc., Lexington, MA, USA), a nanofiltered C1 inhibitor (C1-INH), is approved in Europe for the treatment, preprocedure prevention, and routine prophylaxis of HAE attacks, and for the routine prophylaxis of attacks in the USA. This phase 3 study assessed the safety and efficacy of 2 C1-INH doses in preventing attacks in children aged 6-11 years.

methodsA randomized single-blind crossover study was initiated in March 2014. Results for the first 6 patients completing the study are reported here. After a 12-week qualifying observation period, patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 C1-INH doses, 500 or 1,000 U, every 3-4 days for 12 weeks and crossed over to the alternative dose for a second 12-week period. The primary efficacy endpoint was the number of angioedema attacks per month.

resultsSix females with HAE type I and a median age of 10.5 years received 2 doses of C1-INH (500 and 1,000 U). The mean (SD) difference in the number of monthly angioedema attacks between the baseline observation period and the treatment period was -1.89 (1.31) with 500 U and -1.89 (1.11) with 1,000 U. During the treatment periods, cumulative attack severity, cumulative daily severity, and the number of attacks needing acute treatment were lower. No serious adverse events or study drug discontinuations occurred.

conclusionsInterim findings from this study indicate that routine prevention with intravenous administration of C1-INH is efficacious, safe, and well tolerated in children ≥6 years of age.

Indexed as

Angioedemas, HereditaryChildComplement C1 Inactivator ProteinsComplement C1 Inhibitor ProteinCross-Over StudiesFemaleHumansInfusions, IntravenousSingle-Blind MethodTreatment OutcomeComplement C1 Inactivator ProteinsComplement C1 Inhibitor ProteinSERPING1 protein, humanAttackCinryze®EfficacyHereditary angioedemaPediatric patientsPreventionSafety

Identifiers

PMID28662509
PMCPMC5841133
OpenAlexW2725025256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.