Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28662365›Full record

ArticleRNA biology2017

A compensatory mutagenesis study of a conserved hairpin in the M gene segment of influenza A virus shows its role in virus replication.

M I Spronken, C E van de Sandt, E P de Jongh, O Vuong, S van der Vliet, T M Bestebroer, R C L Olsthoorn, G F Rimmelzwaan, R A M Fouchier, A P Gultyaev

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RNA biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M I Spronkena Department of Viroscience , Erasmus Medical Centre , Rotterdam , the Netherlands.
C E van de Sandta Department of Viroscience , Erasmus Medical Centre , Rotterdam , the Netherlands.
E P de Jongha Department of Viroscience , Erasmus Medical Centre , Rotterdam , the Netherlands.
O Vuonga Department of Viroscience , Erasmus Medical Centre , Rotterdam , the Netherlands.
S van der Vlieta Department of Viroscience , Erasmus Medical Centre , Rotterdam , the Netherlands.
T M Bestebroera Department of Viroscience , Erasmus Medical Centre , Rotterdam , the Netherlands.
R C L Olsthoornc Group Supramolecular and Biomaterials Chemistry, Leiden Institute of Chemistry, Leiden University , Leiden , the Netherlands.
G F Rimmelzwaana Department of Viroscience , Erasmus Medical Centre , Rotterdam , the Netherlands.
R A M Fouchiera Department of Viroscience , Erasmus Medical Centre , Rotterdam , the Netherlands.
A P Gultyaeva Department of Viroscience , Erasmus Medical Centre , Rotterdam , the Netherlands.
Erasmus University Rotterdam · NLLeiden University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RNA structures are increasingly recognized to be of importance during influenza A virus replication. Here, we investigated a predicted conserved hairpin in the M gene segment (nt 967-994) within the region of the vRNA 5' packaging signal. The existence of this RNA structure and its possible role in virus replication was investigated using a compensatory mutagenesis approach. Mutations were introduced in the hairpin stem, based on natural variation. Virus replication properties were studied for the mutant viruses with disrupted and restored RNA structures. Viruses with structure-disrupting mutations had lower virus titers and a significantly reduced median plaque size when compared with the wild-type (WT) virus, while viruses with structure restoring-mutations replicated comparable to WT. Moreover, virus replication was also reduced when mutations were introduced in the hairpin loop, suggesting its involvement in RNA interactions. Northern blot and FACS experiments were performed to study differences in RNA levels as well as production of M1 and M2 proteins, expressed via alternative splicing. Stem-disruptive mutants caused lower vRNA and M2 mRNA levels and reduced M2 protein production at early time-points. When the RNA structure was restored, vRNA, M2 mRNA and M2 protein levels were increased, demonstrating a compensatory effect. Thus, this study provides evidence for functional importance of the predicted M RNA structure and suggests its role in splicing regulation.

Indexed as

Virus ReplicationAlternative SplicingAnimalsBase PairingConserved SequenceDogsHEK293 CellsHumansInfluenza A virusInverted Repeat SequencesMadin Darby Canine Kidney CellsMutagenesisNucleic Acid ConformationRNA, MessengerRNA, ViralStructure-Activity RelationshipRNA, MessengerRNA, ViralViral Matrix ProteinsCompensatory mutagenesisinfluenza A virusnegative sense RNA virusRNA splicingRNA structure

Identifiers

PMID28662365
PMCPMC5785231
OpenAlexW2725816675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.