ArticlePloS one2017
Variation between the oral and faecal microbiota in a free-living passerine bird, the great tit (Parus major).
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metagenomic Profiling of Barn Owl (Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Dietary shifts and gut microbiota plasticity correlates of habitat micromodification in wild oriental storks: implications for conservation physiology.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Metal-induced changes in the early-life gut microbial composition and life-history traits in three insectivorous passerines.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2025Article
- Convergent gut microbiome adaptation and pervasive antibiotic resistome in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau passerines.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Article
- Bacterial communities along parrot digestive and respiratory tracts: the effects of sample type, species and time.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2024Article
- Nearly (?) sterile avian egg in a passerine bird.FEMS microbiology ecology · 2024Article
- Body Size Poorly Predicts Host-Associated Microbial Diversity in Wild Birds.Microbiology spectrum · 2023Article
- Dynamics of Bacterial Communities on Eggshells and on Nest Materials During Incubation in the Oriental Tit (Parus minor).Microbial ecology · 2023Article
- Geography and elevation as drivers of cloacal microbiome assemblages of a passerine bird distributed across Sulawesi, Indonesia.Animal microbiome · 2023Article
- Tree Species Diversity and Forest Edge Density Jointly Shape the Gut Microbiota Composition in Juvenile Great Tits (Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Exploring the faecal microbiome of the Eurasian nuthatch (Sitta europaea).Archives of microbiology · 2021Article
- Gut microbiota in two recently diverged passerine species: evaluating the effects of species identity, habitat use and geographic distance.BMC ecology and evolution · 2021Article
- Flexibility and resilience of great tit (Parus major) gut microbiomes to changing diets.Animal microbiome · 2021Article
- Dietary Correlates of Oral and Gut Microbiota in the Water Monitor Lizard,Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Direct Evidence That Sunbirds' Gut Microbiota Degrades Floral Nectar's Toxic Alkaloids.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Does solar irradiation drive community assembly of vulture plumage microbiotas?Animal microbiome · 2020Article
- Cloacal swabs and alcohol bird specimens are good proxies for compositional analyses of gut microbial communities of Great tits (Parus major).Animal microbiome · 2020Article
- The difference of detection rate of avian influenza virus in the wild bird surveillance using various methods.Journal of veterinary science · 2019Article
- Fecal microbiota associated with phytohaemagglutinin-induced immune response in nestlings of a passerine bird.Ecology and evolution · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The gastrointestinal tract of vertebrates is inhabited by diverse bacterial communities that induce marked effects on the host physiology and health status. The composition of the gastrointestinal microbiota is characterized by pronounced taxonomic and functional variability among different regions of the vertebrate gastrointestinal tract. Despite the relatively solid knowledge on the among-region variations of the gastrointestinal microbiota in model mammalian species, there are only a few studies concerning among-region variations of the gastrointestinal microbiota in free-living non-mammalian vertebrate taxa. We used Illumina MiSeq sequencing of bacterial 16S rRNA amplicons to compare the diversity as well as taxonomic composition of bacterial communities in proximal vs. distal parts of the gastrointestinal tract (represented by oral swabs and faecal samples, respectively) in a wild passerine bird, the great tit (Parus major). The diversity of the oral microbiota was significantly higher compared to the faecal microbiota, whereas interindividual variation was higher in faecal than in oral samples. We also observed a pronounced difference in taxonomic content between the oral and faecal microbiota. Bacteria belonging to the phyla Proteobacteria, Firmicutes and Actinobacteria typically dominated in both oral and faecal samples. A high abundance of bacteria belonging to Tenericutes was observed only in faecal samples. Surprisingly, we found only a slight correlation between the faecal and oral microbiota at the within-individual level, suggesting that the microbial composition in these body sites is shaped by independent regulatory processes. Given the independence of these two communities at the individual level, we propose that simultaneous sampling of the faecal and oral microbiota will extend our understanding of host vs. microbiota interactions in wild populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.