Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28662091›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Revisiting the vulnerability of juvenile bigeye (Thunnus obesus) and yellowfin (T. albacares) tuna caught by purse-seine fisheries while associating with surface waters and floating objects.

Joe Scutt Phillips, Graham M Pilling, Bruno Leroy, Karen Evans, Thomas Usu, Chi Hin Lam, Kurt M Schaefer, Simon Nicol

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Joe Scutt PhillipsClimate Change Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Graham M PillingOceanic Fisheries Programme, The Pacific Community (SPC), Nouméa, New Caledonia.
Bruno LeroyOceanic Fisheries Programme, The Pacific Community (SPC), Nouméa, New Caledonia.
Karen EvansThe Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation Marine and Atmosphere Research, Hobart, Australia.
Thomas UsuNational Fisheries Authority, Port Moresby, Papua, New Guinea.
Chi Hin LamLarge Pelagics Research Centre, University of Massachusetts, Gloucester, United States of America.
Kurt M SchaeferThe Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Simon NicolAustralian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences, Canberra, Australia.
Pacific Community · NCAustralian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics · AUCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation · AUInter-American Tropical Tuna Commission · USNational Department of Health · PGUNSW Sydney · AUWhale Center of New England · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tuna fisheries catch over three million tonnes of skipjack tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis) each year, the majority of which come from purse-seine vessels targeting fish associated with man-made fish aggregating devices (FADs). A significant challenge for fisheries management is to maximize the efficiency of skipjack tuna catches whilst minimizing the bycatch of small and immature bigeye (Thunnus obesus) and yellowfin (T. albacares) tuna, for which long-term sustainability is uncertain in 75% of the world's stocks. To better manage the issues common with this fishing method, an improved understanding of tuna behaviour around FADs is necessary. We probabilistically classified the vertical behavioural patterns of 50 bigeye and 35 yellowfin tuna (mean fork length 72cm and 70cm, respectively) electronically tagged throughout the western and central Pacific Ocean into shallow and deep states, using a state-space modelling approach. The occurrence of surface-association behaviours, defined as an individual remaining in a shallow state for 24-hours, was examined in relation to known capture events and FAD density. In general, surface-association events for both species were short and lasted on average less than three days, although events as long as 28 days were observed, and were more common in yellowfin when in archipelagic waters. Events were longest immediately following tagging in 62% and 17% of bigeye and yellowfin, respectively. Surface-association behaviour was not generally estimated just prior to recapture, being either non-existent or shorter than two days for 85% of bigeye and 74% of yellowfin. Current management measures in purse-seine tuna fisheries involve periodic or spatial closures for FAD use. If the chief benefit to purse-seine fishers of surface-association around floating objects is in locating schools in horizontal space at short-term time-scales, rather than holding fish near the surface for extended periods, controlling the number of sets made on FADs should be explored further as an additional management tool.

Indexed as

FisheriesTunaWater PollutionAnimals

Identifiers

PMID28662091
PMCPMC5490998
OpenAlexW2728517773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.