ArticlePloS one2017
Network analysis of pig movements: Loyalty patterns and contact chains of different holding types in Denmark.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Data quality assessment of pig movements in the Norwegian Livestock Register reveals challenges for outbreak preparedness.BMC veterinary research · 2025Article
- Evolution of the Swiss pork production systems and logistics: the impact on infectious disease resilience.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Analysis of the swine movement network in Mexico: A perspective for disease prevention and control.PloS one · 2024Article
- Network analysis of pig movement data as an epidemiological tool: an Austrian case study.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Direct and indirect pathways for the spread of African swine fever and other porcine infectious diseases: An application of the mental models approach.Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2022Article
- Complex network analysis to understand trading partnership in French swine production.PloS one · 2022Article
- Network analysis of live pig movements in North Macedonia: Pathways for disease spread.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022Article
- A stochastic network-based model to simulate farm-level transmission of African swine fever virus in Vietnam.PloS one · 2021Article
- Integrating animal movements with phylogeography to model the spread of PRRSV in the USA.Virus evolution · 2021Article
- Local and Transboundary Transmissions of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Sequence Type 398 through Pig Trading.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2020Article
- Multilayer and Multiplex Networks: An Introduction to Their Use in Veterinary Epidemiology.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2020Review
- Risk-based eradication as a control measure to limit the spread of LA-MRSA among Danish pig herds - a simulation study.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Simulation modeling of influenza transmission through backyard pig trade networks in a wildlife/livestock interface area.Tropical animal health and production · 2019Article
- Effects of control measures on the spread of LA-MRSA among Danish pig herds between 2006 and 2015 - a simulation study.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Descriptive analysis of horse movement networks during the 2015 equestrian season in Ontario, Canada.PloS one · 2019Article
- Drivers for Livestock-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Spread Among Danish Pig Herds - A Simulation Study.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding animal movements is an important factor for the development of meaningful surveillance and control programs, but also for the development of disease spread models. We analysed the Danish pig movement network using static and temporal network analysis tools to provide deeper insight in the connection between holdings dealing with pigs, such as breeding and multiplier herds, production herds, slaughterhouses or traders. Pig movements, which occurred between 1st January 2006 and 31st December 2015 in Denmark, were summarized to investigate temporal trends such as the number of active holdings, the number of registered movements and the number of pigs moved. To identify holdings and holding types with potentially higher risk for introduction or spread of diseases via pig movements, we determined loyalty patterns, annual network components and contact chains for the 24 registered holding types. The total number of active holdings as well as the number of pig movements decreased during the study period while the holding sizes increased. Around 60-90% of connections between two pig holdings were present in two consecutive years and around one third of the connections persisted within the considered time period. Weaner herds showed the highest level of in-loyalty, whereas we observed an intermediate level of in-loyalty for all breeding sites and for production herds. Boar stations, production herds and trade herds showed a high level of out-loyalty. Production herds constituted the highest proportion of holdings in the largest strongly connected component. All production sites showed low levels of in-going contact chains and we observed a high level of out-going contact chain for breeding and multiplier herds. Except for livestock auctions, all transit sites also showed low levels of out-going contact chains. Our results reflect the pyramidal structure of the underlying network. Based on the considered disease, the time frame for the calculation of network measurements needs to be adapted. Using these adapted values for loyalty and contact chains might help to identify holdings with high potential of spreading diseases and thus limit the outbreak size or support control or eradication of the considered pathogen.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.