ArticlePLoS biology2017
Identifiers for the 21st century: How to design, provision, and reuse persistent identifiers to maximize utility and impact of life science data.
Article in PLoS biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
62 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Integrating multi-omics technologies to decipher microbiome functions.Nature communications · 2026Review
- Programmatic access to ICTV virus taxonomy through a public ontology API.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- The Cell Ontology in the age of single-cell omics.Scientific data · 2026Article
- ClarID: a human-readable and compact identifier specification for biomedical metadata integration.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2026Article
- Childhood Cancer Data Initiative Participant Index: Mapping Pediatric Cancer Data to Facilitate Cross-Study Integrated Analysis.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2026Article
- Article
- Assessing the adoption of the FAIR principles in Italian environmental research infrastructures.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- herbUA Collectors: An open-source framework for online publication of the herbarium collector-centric data.Biodiversity data journal · 2026Article
- Towards an AI biomedical scientist: Accelerating discoveries in neurodegenerative disease.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2025Article
- Infectious, Allergic, and Immune-Mediated Disease Data Resources: a Landscape Overview and Subset Assessment.Journal of medical systems · 2025Review
- ClarID: A Human-Readable and Compact Identifier Specification for Biomedical Metadata Integration.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Opening doors to physical sample tracking and attribution in Earth and environmental sciences.Scientific data · 2025Article
- A Standardized Nomenclature Design for Systematic Referencing and Identification of Animal Cellular Material.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- The challenges of research data management in cardiovascular science: a DGK and DZHK position paper-executive summary.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2024Review
- Evaluating FAIR Digital Object and Linked Data as distributed object systems.PeerJ. Computer science · 2024Article
- PhyloSophos: a high-throughput scientific name mapping algorithm augmented with explicit consideration of taxonomic science, and its application on natural product (NP) occurrence database processing.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Assessing resolvability, parsability, and consistency of RDF resources: a use case in rare diseases.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2023Article
- Subjective data models in bioinformatics and how wet lab and computational biologists conceptualise data.Scientific data · 2023Article
- Ten quick tips for harnessing the power of ChatGPT in computational biology.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
44 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In many disciplines, data are highly decentralized across thousands of online databases (repositories, registries, and knowledgebases). Wringing value from such databases depends on the discipline of data science and on the humble bricks and mortar that make integration possible; identifiers are a core component of this integration infrastructure. Drawing on our experience and on work by other groups, we outline 10 lessons we have learned about the identifier qualities and best practices that facilitate large-scale data integration. Specifically, we propose actions that identifier practitioners (database providers) should take in the design, provision and reuse of identifiers. We also outline the important considerations for those referencing identifiers in various circumstances, including by authors and data generators. While the importance and relevance of each lesson will vary by context, there is a need for increased awareness about how to avoid and manage common identifier problems, especially those related to persistence and web-accessibility/resolvability. We focus strongly on web-based identifiers in the life sciences; however, the principles are broadly relevant to other disciplines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.