Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28661855›Full record

ReviewBlood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue2017

Red blood cell transfusion policy: a critical literature review.

Massimo Franchini, Giuseppe Marano, Carlo Mengoli, Simonetta Pupella, Stefania Vaglio, Manuel Muñoz, Giancarlo M Liumbruno

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Synergistic Effects of a Novel Combination of Natural Compounds Prevent HInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Management of severe traumatic brain injury in pediatric patients: an evidence-based approach.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Review
  16. Restrictive versus liberal transfusion thresholds: lights and shadows.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue · 2025
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Improving normothermic machine perfusion and blood transfusion through biocompatible blood silicification.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Massimo FranchiniItalian National Blood Centre, National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.
Giuseppe MaranoItalian National Blood Centre, National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.
Carlo MengoliItalian National Blood Centre, National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.
Simonetta PupellaItalian National Blood Centre, National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.
Stefania VaglioItalian National Blood Centre, National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.
Manuel MuñozPerioperative Transfusion Medicine, Department of Surgical Sciences, Biochemistry and Immunology, School of Medicine, Málaga, Spain.
Giancarlo M LiumbrunoItalian National Blood Centre, National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The issue of the most appropriate red blood cell transfusion policy has been addressed by a number of randomised controlled trials, conducted over the last decades, comparing the effects on patients' outcome of restrictive blood transfusion strategies (transfusing when the haemoglobin concentration is less than 7 g/dL to 8 g/dL) vs more liberal ones (transfusing when the haemoglobin concentration is less than 9 g/dL to 10 g/dL) in a variety of clinical settings. In parallel, various systematic reviews and meta-analyses have tried to perform pooled analyses of the data from these randomised controlled trials and their results have been utilised by scientific societies to provide recommendations and guidelines on red blood cell transfusion thresholds. All these aspects will be critically discussed in this narrative review.

Indexed as

AnemiaErythrocyte TransfusionFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID28661855
PMCPMC5490725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.