Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28661774›Full record

ArticleJournal of women's health (2002)2017

The Impact of Physical Disability on Pregnancy and Childbirth.

Linda Long-Bellil, Monika Mitra, Lisa I Iezzoni, Suzanne C Smeltzer, Lauren Smith

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of women's health (2002), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Pregnancy, Motherhood and Partner Support in Visually Impaired Women: A Qualitative Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Linda Long-Bellil1 Center for Health Policy and Research, Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Massachusetts Medical School , Shrewsbury, Massachusetts.
Monika Mitra2 Lurie Institute for Disability Policy, Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University , Waltham, Massachusetts.
Lisa I Iezzoni3 Mongan Institute for Health Policy , Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Suzanne C Smeltzer5 Center for Nursing Research, Villanova University College of Nursing , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Lauren Smith2 Lurie Institute for Disability Policy, Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University , Waltham, Massachusetts.
Brandeis University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWomen with physical disabilities increasingly aspire to become pregnant and bear children. Limited information about the potential interaction of their disabling conditions with pregnancy and childbirth exists to guide these women and their clinicians. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe interview guide was created with questions on topics such as pregnancy complications and secondary conditions, the impact of prior surgeries, experiences with pain relief during labor, and the impact on women's independence and participation in life activities. Interviews were conducted by telephone with 25 women with physical disabilities. They were subsequently transcribed verbatim and analyzed by using Atlas TI.

resultsWomen generally reported a relatively modest impact of disabling conditions on their pregnancies. Most women were satisfied with the mode of delivery, but they experienced challenges during the labor and delivery process. The women found that careful advanced planning was helpful in managing the impact of their disabling conditions. The involvement of clinicians with disability-related expertise was, in some cases, another factor that contributed to a positive outcome.

conclusionsThe importance of advanced planning and the utility of involving clinicians with disability-related expertise suggest that the use of integrated, interdisciplinary team approaches could promote quality care by facilitating improved planning and management. Additional clinical research is needed to provide women and their clinicians with more information on potential complications and options for labor and delivery.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeParturitionPersons with DisabilitiesPregnancy, High-RiskAdultDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMacrophage-Activating FactorsMothersPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPrenatal CareProtein PrecursorsQualitative ResearchMacrophage-Activating FactorspreGc1f1fMAF protein, humanProtein Precursorsdisabilitieshealth disparitieshigh-risk pregnancylabor and deliveryobstetricspregnancy

Identifiers

PMID28661774
PMCPMC5576221
OpenAlexW2731583862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.