Single-Minded Research Review: The Common Rule and Single IRB Policy.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Blind spots: The hidden challenges of conducting multisite intervention research.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2026
   Article
2. Economic analysis of a single institutional review board data exchange standard in multisite clinical studies.Contemporary clinical trials · 2022
   Article
3. The IRB Reliance Exchange (IREx): A national web-based platform for operationalizing single IRB review.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2022
   Article
4. Stakeholder Experiences with the Single IRB Review Process and Recommendations for Food and Drug Administration Guidance.Ethics & human research · 2021
   Article
5. "You Really Do Have to Know the Local Context": IRB Administrators and Researchers on the Implications of the NIH Single IRB Mandate for Multisite Genomic Studies.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2019
   Article
6. Transitioning to the National Institutes of Health single institutional review board model: Piloting the use of the Streamlined, Multi-site, Accelerated Resources for Trials IRB Reliance.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2019
   Article
7. Community Protections in American Indian and Alaska Native Participatory Research-A Scoping Review.Social sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
   Article
8. Why Public Comments Matter: The Case of the National Institutes of Health Policy on Single Institutional Review Board Review of Multicenter Studies.Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges · 2018
   Article
9. How U.S. research institutions are responding to the single Institutional Review Board mandate.Accountability in research · 2018
   Article
10. A Study of Reliance Agreement Templates Used by U.S. Research Institutions.IRB
    Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as