Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28661398›Full record

ArticleeLife2017

Unbridle biomedical research from the laboratory cage.

Garet P Lahvis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Wild capuchin monkeys as a model system for investigating the social and ecological determinants of ageing.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Home-cage behavior is impacted by stress exposure in rats.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Sleep research goes wild: new methods and approaches to investigate the ecology, evolution and functions of sleep.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Garet P LahvisDepartment of Behavioral Neuroscience, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1986-8251

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many biomedical research studies use captive animals to model human health and disease. However, a surprising number of studies show that the biological systems of animals living in standard laboratory housing are abnormal. To make animal studies more relevant to human health, research animals should live in the wild or be able to roam free in captive environments that offer a natural range of both positive and negative experiences. Recent technological advances now allow us to study freely roaming animals and we should make use of them.

Indexed as

Animals, LaboratoryDisease Models, AnimalAnimalsBehavior, AnimalBiomedical ResearchHumansanimal welfarebiomedical researchcaptivityecologyneurosciencesentience

Identifiers

PMID28661398
PMCPMC5503508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.