Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28660522›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2018

Rectal Cancer Surveillance-Recurrence Patterns and Survival Outcomes from a Cohort Followed up Beyond 10 Years.

Winson Jianhong Tan, Hiang Jin Tan, Sreemanee Raaj Dorajoo, Fung Joon Foo, Choong Leong Tang, Min Hoe Chew

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A multistate survival model in rectal cancer surgery research for locally advanced patients.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2024
    Article
  5. Local Recurrences in Rectal Cancer: MRI vs. CT.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Winson Jianhong TanDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, 20 College Road, Academia, Singapore, 169856, Singapore.
Hiang Jin TanDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, 20 College Road, Academia, Singapore, 169856, Singapore.
Sreemanee Raaj DorajooDepartment of Pharmacy, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Fung Joon FooDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, 20 College Road, Academia, Singapore, 169856, Singapore.
Choong Leong TangDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, 20 College Road, Academia, Singapore, 169856, Singapore.
Min Hoe ChewDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, 20 College Road, Academia, Singapore, 169856, Singapore. chew.min.hoe@singhealth.com.sg.
Singapore General Hospital · SGNational University of Singapore · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe intensity and duration of surveillance for rectal cancer after surgical resection remain contentious. We evaluated the pattern of recurrences in a rectal cancer cohort followed up beyond 10 years.

methodsAn analysis was performed on a retrospective database of 326 patients with rectal cancer who underwent curative surgical resection from 1999 to 2007. The above study duration was chosen to ensure at least 10 years of follow-up. Data on patient demographics, peri-operative details, and follow-up outcomes were extracted from the database. The pattern of recurrences and investigative modality that detected recurrences was identified. Patients were followed up until either year 2016 or the day of their demise.

resultsTwo hundred seventeen patients (66.6%) were male and 109 patients (33.3%) female. Median age was 64 years old. Close to a third of the patients received adjuvant therapy (34%). Among the 326 patients studied, 29.8% of (97/326) patients developed recurrence. 7.7% (25/326) had loco-regional recurrence while 22.1% (72/326) had distant metastasis. Median time to recurrence was 16 months (4-83) and 18 months (3-81), respectively. Computed tomography scan was the best modality to detect both loco-regional and distant recurrences (48% in loco-regional and 41.7% in distant metastasis). The most common site of distant metastasis is the lung (34.7%). The salvage rate for loco-regional and distant recurrences was 52 and 12.5%, respectively.

conclusionThe predominant pattern of recurrence in rectal cancer is distant disease. Surveillance regimes may need to be altered to increase early detection of distant metastases.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceLungLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProctectomyRectal NeoplasmsInvestigative modalityRectal cancerRecurrenceSurveillance

Identifiers

PMID28660522
OpenAlexW2726081811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.