Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28660285›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2017

Exploring the quiet eye in archery using field- and laboratory-based tasks.

Claudia C Gonzalez, Joe Causer, Michael J Grey, Glyn W Humphreys, R Chris Miall, A Mark Williams

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Claudia C GonzalezCentre for Cognitive Neuroscience, College of Health and Life Sciences, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UB8 3PH, UK.
Joe CauserResearch Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Tom Reilly Building, Byrom Street, Liverpool, Merseyside, L3 3AF, UK.
Michael J GreySchool of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Glyn W HumphreysDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Tinbergen Building, 9 South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3UD, UK.
R Chris MiallSchool of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
A Mark WilliamsDepartment of Health, Kinesiology, and Recreation, College of Health, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA. mark.williams@health.utah.edu.
University of Birmingham · GBBrunel University of London · GBLiverpool John Moores University · GBUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J017248/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J018880/1Wellcome Trust WT087554
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 'quiet eye' (QE)-a period of extended gaze fixation on a target-has been reported in many tasks that require accurate aiming. Longer quiet eye durations (QEDs) are reported in experts compared to non-experts and on successful versus less successful trials. The QE has been extensively studied in the field; however, the cognitive mechanisms underlying the QE are not yet fully understood. We investigated the QEDs of ten expert and ten novice archers in the field and in the laboratory using a computer-based archery task. The computer task consisted of shooting archery targets using a joystick. Random 'noise' (visual motion perturbation) was introduced at high and low levels to allow for the controlled examination of the effects of task complexity and processing demands. In this computer task, we also tested an additional group of ten non-archers as controls. In both field and computer tasks, eye movements were measured using electro-oculography. The expert archers exhibited longer QED compared to the novice archers in the field task. In the computer task, the archers again exhibited longer QEDs and were more accurate compared to non-archers. Furthermore, expert archers showed earlier QE onsets and longer QEDs during high noise conditions compared to the novices and non-archers. Our findings show skill-based effects on QED in field conditions and in a novel computer-based archery task, in which online (visual) perturbations modulated experts' QEDs. These longer QEDs in experts may be used for more efficient programming in which accurate predictions are facilitated by attention control.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAthletic PerformanceAttentionFemaleFixation, OcularHumansMalePsychomotor PerformanceVisual PerceptionYoung AdultAimingAttentionExpertsGazeProgramming

Identifiers

PMID28660285
PMCPMC5550539
OpenAlexW2730294909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.