Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28660128›Full record

ArticleIDCases2017

Medical and surgical management of

Ankit Shah, Mansi Talati, Thomas Mauger

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in IDCases, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ankit ShahOhio State University Havener Eye Institute Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, USA.
Mansi TalatiOhio State University Havener Eye Institute Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, USA.
Thomas MaugerOhio State University Havener Eye Institute Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWe describe a case of refractory CASE DISCUSSION: A 70-year-old male had persistent corneal edema related to previous herpes zoster keratouveitis with visual acuity of 20/400. An endothelial keratoplasty was performed with improvement in vision to 20/25. Several months after this surgery the patient developed a corneal infiltrate and cultures grew DISCUSSION: The patient achieved pain relief immediately after the flap was placed. Medications were tapered off in the following few months after the procedure. A penetrating keratoplasty was performed 4 months later. The patient has remained almost entirely symptom free, and the graft remained clear one year after surgery.

conclusionsA keratitis caused by

Indexed as

Conjunctival flapKeratitisPasteurella canisPenetrating keratoplasty

Identifiers

PMID28660128
PMCPMC5479940
OpenAlexW2619842906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.