ArticleFrontiers in genetics2017
The Human Microbiome and the Missing Heritability Problem.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Landscape of Genetic Content in the Gut and Oral Human Microbiome.Cell host & microbe · 2019Pooled it
- Quantitative genetics of microbiome-mediated traits.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2025Article
- Challenges and Opportunities in Characterizing the Genetics of Stuttering: From Sample Acquisition to Functional Interpretation of the Genome.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2025Review
- Emerging multifaceted roles of the microbiome in cancer susceptibility.World journal of clinical oncology · 2025Review
- Bidirectional crosstalk between the gut microbiota and cellular compartments of brain: Implications for neurodevelopmental and neuropsychiatric disorders.Translational psychiatry · 2025Review
- Genome-wide association study of Northern corn leaf blight (NCLB) resistance using temperate and subtropical maize recombinant inbred lines.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Preliminary Insights Into the Relationship Between the Gut Microbiome and Host Genome in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.Genes, brain, and behavior · 2025Article
- Identifying sepsis susceptibility genes in post-surgical patients using an artificial intelligence approach.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Gut microbiota in gastric cancer: from pathogenesis to precision medicine.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
- Gene-environment interactions in human health.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2024Review
- Changes in gut microbiota and metabolites of mice with intravenous graphene oxide-induced embryo toxicity.Toxicological research · 2024Article
- The Power of Psychobiotics in Depression: A Modern Approach through the Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis: A Literature Review.Nutrients · 2024Review
- Identification of a strong genetic risk factor for major depressive disorder in the human virome.iScience · 2024Article
- Scrutinizing microbiome determinism: why deterministic hypotheses about the microbiome are conceptually ungrounded.History and philosophy of the life sciences · 2024Article
- An improved transmissibility model to detect transgenerational transmitted environmental effects.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2023Article
- Genetic risk assessment based on association and prediction studies.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- The Role of the Microbiome in First Episode of Psychosis.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Reconstitution and Transmission of Gut Microbiomes and Their Genes between Generations.Microorganisms · 2021Review
- Suitability of GWAS as a Tool to Discover SNPs Associated with Tick Resistance in Cattle: A Review.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- The microbiome extends host evolutionary potential.Nature communications · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The "missing heritability" problem states that genetic variants in Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) cannot completely explain the heritability of complex traits. Traditionally, the heritability of a phenotype is measured through familial studies using twins, siblings and other close relatives, making assumptions on the genetic similarities between them. When this heritability is compared to the one obtained through GWAS for the same traits, a substantial gap between both measurements arise with genome wide studies reporting significantly smaller values. Several mechanisms for this "missing heritability" have been proposed, such as epigenetics, epistasis, and sequencing depth. However, none of them are able to fully account for this gap in heritability. In this paper we provide evidence that suggests that in order for the phenotypic heritability of human traits to be broadly understood and accounted for, the compositional and functional diversity of the human microbiome must be taken into account. This hypothesis is based on several observations: (A) The composition of the human microbiome is associated with many important traits, including obesity, cancer, and neurological disorders. (B) Our microbiome encodes a second genome with nearly a 100 times more genes than the human genome, and this second genome may act as a rich source of genetic variation and phenotypic plasticity. (C) Human genotypes interact with the composition and structure of our microbiome, but cannot by themselves explain microbial variation. (D) Microbial genetic composition can be strongly influenced by the host's behavior, its environment or by vertical and horizontal transmissions from other hosts. Therefore, genetic similarities assumed in familial studies may cause overestimations of heritability values. We also propose a method that allows the compositional and functional diversity of our microbiome to be incorporated to genome wide association studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.