Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28659934›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2017

Morphological Plant Modeling: Unleashing Geometric and Topological Potential within the Plant Sciences.

Alexander Bucksch, Acheampong Atta-Boateng, Akomian F Azihou, Dorjsuren Battogtokh, Aly Baumgartner, Brad M Binder, Siobhan A Braybrook, Cynthia Chang, Viktoirya Coneva, Thomas J DeWitt and 27 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

37 authors.

Alexander BuckschDepartment of Plant Biology, University of Georgia, AthensGA, United States.
Acheampong Atta-BoatengSchool of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale University, New HavenCT, United States.
Akomian F AzihouLaboratory of Applied Ecology, Faculty of Agronomic Sciences, University of Abomey-CalaviCotonou, Benin.
Dorjsuren BattogtokhDepartment of Biological Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, BlacksburgVA, United States.
Aly BaumgartnerDepartment of Geosciences, Baylor University, WacoTX, United States.
Brad M BinderDepartment of Biochemistry and Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, KnoxvilleTN, United States.
Siobhan A BraybrookThe Sainsbury Laboratory, University of CambridgeCambridge, United Kingdom.
Cynthia ChangDivision of Biology, University of Washington, BothellWA, United States.
Viktoirya ConevaDonald Danforth Plant Science Center, St. LouisMO, United States.
Thomas J DeWittDepartment of Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences-Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Texas A&M University, College StationTX, United States.
Alexander G FletcherSchool of Mathematics and Statistics and Bateson Centre, University of SheffieldSheffield, United Kingdom.
Malia A GehanDonald Danforth Plant Science Center, St. LouisMO, United States.
Diego Hernan Diaz-MartinezDepartment of Mathematics, Florida State University, TallahasseeFL, United States.
Lilan HongWeill Institute for Cell and Molecular Biology and Section of Plant Biology, School of Integrative Plant Sciences, Cornell University, IthacaNY, United States.
Anjali S Iyer-PascuzziDepartment of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West LafayetteIN, United States.
Laura L KleinDepartment of Biology, Saint Louis University, St. LouisMO, United States.
Samuel LeiboffSchool of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, IthacaNY, United States.
Mao LiDepartment of Mathematics, Florida State University, TallahasseeFL, United States.
Jonathan P LynchDepartment of Plant Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University ParkPA, United States.
Alexis MaizelCenter for Organismal Studies, Heidelberg UniversityHeidelberg, Germany.
Julin N MaloofDepartment of Plant Biology, University of California, Davis, DavisCA, United States.
R J Cody MarkelzDepartment of Plant Biology, University of California, Davis, DavisCA, United States.
Ciera C MartinezDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, BerkeleyCA, United States.
Laura A MillerProgram in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of North Carolina, Chapel HillNC, United States.
Washington MioDepartment of Mathematics, Florida State University, TallahasseeFL, United States.
Wojtek PalubickiThe Sainsbury Laboratory, University of CambridgeCambridge, United Kingdom.
Hendrik PoorterPlant Sciences (IBG-2), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, JülichGermany.
Christophe PradalCIRAD, UMR AGAP, INRIA, VirtualPlantsMontpellier, France.
Charles A PriceNational Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, KnoxvilleTN, United States.
Eetu PuttonenDepartment of Remote Sensing and Photogrammetry, Finnish Geospatial Research Institute, National Land Survey of FinlandMasala, Finland.
John B ReeseDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, KnoxvilleTN, United States.
Rubén Rellán-ÁlvarezUnidad de Genómica Avanzada, Laboratorio Nacional de Genómica para la Biodiversidad, Center for Research and Advanced Studies of the National Polytechnic Institute (CINVESTAV)Irapuato, Mexico.
Edgar P SpaldingDepartment of Botany, University of Wisconsin-Madison, MadisonWI, United States.
Erin E SparksDepartment of Plant and Soil Sciences and Delaware Biotechnology Institute, University of Delaware, NewarkDE, United States.
Christopher N ToppDonald Danforth Plant Science Center, St. LouisMO, United States.
Joseph H WilliamsDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, KnoxvilleTN, United States.
Daniel H ChitwoodDonald Danforth Plant Science Center, St. LouisMO, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The geometries and topologies of leaves, flowers, roots, shoots, and their arrangements have fascinated plant biologists and mathematicians alike. As such, plant morphology is inherently mathematical in that it describes plant form and architecture with geometrical and topological techniques. Gaining an understanding of how to modify plant morphology, through molecular biology and breeding, aided by a mathematical perspective, is critical to improving agriculture, and the monitoring of ecosystems is vital to modeling a future with fewer natural resources. In this white paper, we begin with an overview in quantifying the form of plants and mathematical models of patterning in plants. We then explore the fundamental challenges that remain unanswered concerning plant morphology, from the barriers preventing the prediction of phenotype from genotype to modeling the movement of leaves in air streams. We end with a discussion concerning the education of plant morphology synthesizing biological and mathematical approaches and ways to facilitate research advances through outreach, cross-disciplinary training, and open science. Unleashing the potential of geometric and topological approaches in the plant sciences promises to transform our understanding of both plants and mathematics.

Indexed as

mathematicsmodelingmorphologyplant biologyplant sciencetopology

Identifiers

PMID28659934
PMCPMC5465304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.