ArticleClinical Medicine Insights. Oncology2017
Accuracy of [
Article in Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- PET-CT detection of local residual laryngeal carcinoma after definitive (chemo)radiotherapy.BMC cancer · 2023Article
- Second-look PET-CT following an initial incomplete PET-CT response to (chemo)radiotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.European radiology · 2020Article
- A Review of Controversial Issues in the Management of Head and Neck Cancer: A Swiss Multidisciplinary and Multi-Institutional Patterns of Care Study-Part 2 (Radiation Oncology).Frontiers in oncology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe accuracy of response assessment positron emission tomography (PET)-computed tomography (CT) following radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy for laryngeal/hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma is uncertain.
methodsIn all, 35 patients with laryngeal or hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma who were treated between 2009 and 2014 with (chemo)radiotherapy were identified. The accuracy of response assessment PET-CT was made by correlation with clinical follow-up and pathological findings.
resultsOf the 35 patients, 20 (57%) had an overall complete metabolic response. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for response assessment [18Fluorine]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG) PET-CT for primary and nodal sites, respectively, were 100%, 73%, 46%, and 100% and 83%, 95%, 83%, and 95%.
conclusionsResponse assessment FDG PET-CT following (chemo)radiotherapy for laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinomas has a high NPV for both primary site and lymph nodes and can be used to guide treatment decisions. The PPV of residual FDG uptake at the primary tumour site is limited and requires examination and biopsy confirmation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.