ArticleThe Indian journal of surgery2017
'Never Events in Surgery': Mere Error or an Avoidable Disaster.
Article in The Indian journal of surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inappropriate administration of mitomycin in a cataract patient.American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2025Article
- A Retained Foreign Body as a Rare Cause of Small Bowel Obstruction (Gossypiboma): A Case Report.Cureus · 2023Article
- Intraoperative practices to prevent wrong-level spine surgery: a survey among 105 spine surgeons in the United Kingdom.Patient safety in surgery · 2022Article
- Identification of Common Themes from Never Events Data Published by NHS England.World journal of surgery · 2021Article
- Cardiopulmonary Bypass Video Is an Effective Learning Tool.Ochsner journal · 2020Article
- The quality of antimicrobial prescribing in acute care hospitals: results derived from a national point prevalence survey, Germany, 2016.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Never events in surgery is not an uncommon occurrence. It is difficult to find any surgeon who never had an experience of one or another kind of mistake, committed while delivering the surgical care to the patient. Whatever the reports come out through news media or other sources are just a tip of iceberg. Collectively, its results, not only as a huge suffering and financial burden for the patients but also its impact on the operating surgeon and sometimes to related institute, are very far reaching and extremely negative. In spite of all of this, every one of us thinks this as an individual problem or one of the anecdotal media coverage. The aim of this study is to create an awareness among surgeon's fraternity and bring the attention of associations of surgeon bodies to this serious issue so that collective steps can be initiated to address it. In an attempt to find all the related information, an extensive search of literature in English language was performed using online search engines: PubMed NCBI database, Google search, and other digital sources available online. Error may be in the form of an act of commission, act of omission, error of planning, or error of execution, but whatever the reason, ultimate impacts are not less than disastrous, affecting individuals to global level. In addition to the enforcing authorities, all other stake holders should wake up and must take collective and comprehensive approach to create a safety system inside the health care organisations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.