Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28659410›Full record

ReviewJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2017

Addressing current challenges in cancer immunotherapy with mathematical and computational modelling.

Anna Konstorum, Anthony T Vella, Adam J Adler, Reinhard C Laubenbacher

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Immune-checkpoint inhibitor therapy response evaluation using oncophysics-based mathematical models.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Multiscale modeling in disease.Current opinion in systems biology · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
  20. CARTCancers · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anna KonstorumCenter for Quantitative Medicine, UConn Health, Farmington, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4024-2058
Anthony T VellaDepartment of Immunology, UConn Health, Farmington, CT, USA.
Adam J AdlerDepartment of Immunology, UConn Health, Farmington, CT, USA.
Reinhard C LaubenbacherCenter for Quantitative Medicine, UConn Health, Farmington, CT, USA laubenbacher@uchc.edu.

Funding

Iron, Ferroptosis and Ovarian CancerR01CA188025 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI TORTI, SUZY V · 2014 to 2024
$3.9M
Multiscale modeling of synergistic T cell activation for cancer immunotherapyF32CA214030 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI KONSTORUM, ANNA · 2017 to 2018
$116k
NCI NIH HHS F32 CA214030NCI NIH HHS R01 CA188025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of cancer immunotherapy is to boost a patient's immune response to a tumour. Yet, the design of an effective immunotherapy is complicated by various factors, including a potentially immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment, immune-modulating effects of conventional treatments and therapy-related toxicities. These complexities can be incorporated into mathematical and computational models of cancer immunotherapy that can then be used to aid in rational therapy design. In this review, we survey modelling approaches under the umbrella of the major challenges facing immunotherapy development, which encompass tumour classification, optimal treatment scheduling and combination therapy design. Although overlapping, each challenge has presented unique opportunities for modellers to make contributions using analytical and numerical analysis of model outcomes, as well as optimization algorithms. We discuss several examples of models that have grown in complexity as more biological information has become available, showcasing how model development is a dynamic process interlinked with the rapid advances in tumour-immune biology. We conclude the review with recommendations for modellers both with respect to methodology and biological direction that might help keep modellers at the forefront of cancer immunotherapy development.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, BiologicalHumansImmunotherapyNeoplasmscancer immunotherapymathematical modellingoptimal control

Identifiers

PMID28659410
PMCPMC5493798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.