Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28659281›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2017

Diverse Roads to Relapse: A Discriminative Cue Signaling Cocaine Availability Is More Effective in Renewing Cocaine Seeking in Goal Trackers Than Sign Trackers and Depends on Basal Forebrain Cholinergic Activity.

Kyle K Pitchers, Kyra B Phillips, Jonte L Jones, Terry E Robinson, Martin Sarter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Disrupted Choline Clearance and Sustained Acetylcholine ReleaseThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kyle K PitchersDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109.ORCID 0000-0002-9609-3445
Kyra B PhillipsDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109.
Jonte L JonesDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109.ORCID 0000-0001-8555-5360
Terry E RobinsonDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109.
Martin SarterDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 msarter@umich.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0441-9936

Funding

Variation in Motivational Properties of Reward Cues: Implications for AddictionP01DA031656 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ROBINSON, TERRY E. · 2012 to 2016
$6.3M
NIDA NIH HHS P01 DA031656
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stimuli associated with taking drugs are notorious instigators of relapse. There is, however, considerable variation in the motivational properties of such stimuli, both as a function of the individual and the nature of the stimulus. The behavior of some individuals (sign trackers, STs) is especially influenced by cues paired with reward delivery, perhaps because they are prone to process information via dopamine-dependent, cue-driven, incentive salience systems. Other individuals (goal trackers, GTs) are better able to incorporate higher-order contextual information, perhaps because of better executive/attentional control over behavior, which requires frontal cortical cholinergic activity. We hypothesized, therefore, that a cue that "sets the occasion" for drug taking (a discriminative stimulus, DS) would reinstate cocaine seeking more readily in GTs than STs and that this would require intact cholinergic neurotransmission. To test this, male STs and GTs were trained to self-administer cocaine using an intermittent access schedule with periods of cocaine availability and unavailability signaled by a DS

Indexed as

CuesAnimalsAttentional BiasCholinergic NeuronsCocaineCocaine-Related DisordersDrug-Seeking BehaviorMaleMotivationProsencephalonRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyRecurrenceCocaineacetylcholineaddictionbasal forebraindrug cuesrelapsesign and goal trackers

Identifiers

PMID28659281
PMCPMC5546399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.