ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2017
Tracing the Potential Flow of Consumer Data: A Network Analysis of Prominent Health and Fitness Apps.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ethical, legal, and social issues related to ingestible, implantable electronic devices and mRNA delivery devices.Device · 2025Article
- Article
- Patterns of willingness to share health data with key stakeholders in US consumers: a latent class analysis.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025Article
- Citizen data sovereignty is key to wearables and wellness data reuse for the common good.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Mobile Apps for Dietary and Food Timing Assessment: Evaluation for Use in Clinical Research.JMIR formative research · 2023Article
- Development and Evaluation of Health Recommender Systems: Systematic Scoping Review and Evidence Mapping.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- Stay Present with Your Phone: A Systematic Review and Standardized Rating of Mindfulness Apps in European App Stores.International journal of behavioral medicine · 2021Article
- Analysis of Diabetes Apps to Assess Privacy-Related Permissions: Systematic Search of Apps.JMIR diabetes · 2021Article
- Distributed Solutions for a Reliable Data-Driven Transformation of Healthcare Management and Research.Frontiers in public health · 2021Article
- Commercialization of User Data by Developers of Medicines-Related Apps: a Content Analysis.Journal of general internal medicine · 2019Article
- Wearable Health Technology and Electronic Health Record Integration: Scoping Review and Future Directions.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2019Article
- Artificial Intelligence and the Implementation Challenge.Journal of medical Internet research · 2019Article
- Transcending the brain: is there a cost to hacking the nervous system?Brain communications · 2019Review
- Cross-Sectoral Big Data: The Application of an Ethics Framework for Big Data in Health and Research.Asian bioethics review · 2019Article
- Measuring the Quality of Mobile Apps for the Management of Pain: Systematic Search and Evaluation Using the Mobile App Rating Scale.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2018Article
- Online Influence and Sentiment of Fitness Tweets: Analysis of Two Million Fitness Tweets.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2017Article
- Technology Interventions to Manage Food Intake: Where Are We Now?Current diabetes reports · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA great deal of consumer data, collected actively through consumer reporting or passively through sensors, is shared among apps. Developers increasingly allow their programs to communicate with other apps, sensors, and Web-based services, which are promoted as features to potential users. However, health apps also routinely pose risks related to information leaks, information manipulation, and loss of information. There has been less investigation into the kinds of user data that developers are likely to collect, and who might have access to it.
objectiveWe sought to describe how consumer data generated from mobile health apps might be distributed and reused. We also aimed to outline risks to individual privacy and security presented by this potential for aggregating and combining user data across apps.
methodsWe purposively sampled prominent health and fitness apps available in the United States, Canada, and Australia Google Play and iTunes app stores in November 2015. Two independent coders extracted data from app promotional materials on app and developer characteristics, and the developer-reported collection and sharing of user data. We conducted a descriptive analysis of app, developer, and user data collection characteristics. Using structural equivalence analysis, we conducted a network analysis of sampled apps' self-reported sharing of user-generated data.
resultsWe included 297 unique apps published by 231 individual developers, which requested 58 different permissions (mean 7.95, SD 6.57). We grouped apps into 222 app families on the basis of shared ownership. Analysis of self-reported data sharing revealed a network of 359 app family nodes, with one connected central component of 210 app families (58.5%). Most (143/222, 64.4%) of the sampled app families did not report sharing any data and were therefore isolated from each other and from the core network. Fifteen app families assumed more central network positions as gatekeepers on the shortest paths that data would have to travel between other app families.
conclusionsThis cross-sectional analysis highlights the possibilities for user data collection and potential paths that data is able to travel among a sample of prominent health and fitness apps. While individual apps may not collect personally identifiable information, app families and the partners with which they share data may be able to aggregate consumer data, thus achieving a much more comprehensive picture of the individual consumer. The organizations behind the centrally connected app families represent diverse industries, including apparel manufacturers and social media platforms that are not traditionally involved in health or fitness. This analysis highlights the potential for anticipated and voluntary but also possibly unanticipated and involuntary sharing of user data, validating privacy and security concerns in mobile health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.