ArticleExperimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.)2017
Programming microphysiological systems for children's health protection.
Article in Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engineering Epithelial-Mesenchymal Microtissues to Study Cell-Cell Interactions in Development.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Pluripotent stem cell assays: Modalities and applications for predictive developmental toxicity.Current research in toxicology · 2022Article
- FutureTox IV Workshop Summary: Predictive Toxicology for Healthy Children.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2021Review
- A Microphysiological Approach to Evaluate Effectors of Intercellular Hedgehog Signaling in Development.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Article
- Meeting report on the NIDDK/AUA Workshop on Congenital Anomalies of External Genitalia: challenges and opportunities for translational research.Journal of pediatric urology · 2020Review
- Rethinking developmental toxicity testing: Evolution or revolution?Birth defects research · 2018Article
- Circadian hormone control in a human-on-a-chip: In vitro biology's ignored component?Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2017Review
- Fitting tissue chips and microphysiological systems into the grand scheme of medicine, biology, pharmacology, and toxicology.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microphysiological systems (MPS) and computer simulation models that recapitulate the underlying biology and toxicology of critical developmental transitions are emerging tools for developmental effects assessment of drugs/chemicals. Opportunities and challenges exist for their application to alternative, more public health relevant and efficient chemical toxicity testing methods. This is especially pertinent to children's health research and the evaluation of complex embryological and reproductive impacts of drug/chemical exposure. Scaling these technologies to higher throughput is a key challenge and drives the need for in silico models for quantitative prediction of developmental toxicity to inform safety assessments. One example is cellular agent-based models, constructed from extant embryology, that produce data useful to simulate critical developmental transitions and thereby predict phenotypic consequences of disruption in silico. Biologically inspired MPS models built from human induced pluripotent stem (iPS)-derived cells and synthetic matrices that recapitulate organ-specific physiologies and native tissue architectures are providing exciting new research opportunities to advance the assessment of developmental toxicity and offer the possibility of deriving a full 'human on a chip' system, or a 'Homunculus.' Impact statement This 'commentary' summarizes research needs and opportunities for engineered MPS models for developmental and reproductive toxicity testing. Emerging concepts can be taken forward to a virtual tissue modeling framework for assessing chemical (and non-chemical) stressors on human development. These models will advance children's health research, both basic and translational and new ways to evaluate complex embryological and reproductive impacts of drug and chemical exposures to inform safety assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.