ArticleJournal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR2017
Diagnostic Utility of Epithelial Membrane Antigen (EMA) and Calretinin (CAL) in Effusion Cytology.
Article in Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Well-Differentiated Papillary Mesothelioma with Omental Calcifications: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.The American journal of case reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionFluid cytology and subsequent utilization of immunocytology on cell block is being used commonly for increasing the diagnostic accuracy in effusion cytology.
aimTo do cytological analysis of fluids and evaluate the role of Epithelial Membrane Antigen (EMA) and Calretinin (CAL) to differentiate between reactive and malignant cell in pleural and peritoneal fluids. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis was a prospective study carried out in Department of Pathology, Shri Guru Ram Rai Institue of Medical and Health Science, for a period of 18 months from January 2014 to June 2015. A total of 253 samples of pleural and peritoneal fluid were studied by May-Gruenwald-Giemsa (MGG) stain and Papanicolaou (Pap) staining. In 73 cases which were suspicious for malignancy, cell blocks were prepared and IHC was done using two immunomarkers- EMA and CAL.
resultsA total of 253 cases of effusion cytology were studied out of which 73 were found positive for malignant cells. Maximum cases of malignant cells or atypical cells were seen in peritoneal fluid. A total of 34 cases were histologically positive for malignancy. All these cases showed strong membranous and cytoplasmic positivity for EMA. Most of cases also showed 2%-5% positivity for CAL. There were 38 cases categorized as atypical or reactive mesothelial cell hyperplasia. These cases showed nuclear and cytoplasmic staining for calretinin and none of these were positive for EMA, although 5 cases showed score 2-3, which was considered as negative.
conclusionThe distinction between reactive and malignant mesothelial cells in cytological specimens can be problematic. A combination of CAL and EMA may help in accurate diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.