Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28658431›Full record

Trial reportClinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2017

Influence of the prone position on a stretcher for pregnant women on maternal and fetal hemodynamic parameters and comfort in pregnancy.

Claudia Oliveira, Marco Antonio Borges Lopes, Agatha Sacramento Rodrigues, Marcelo Zugaib, Rossana Pulcineli Vieira Francisco

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Peripartum Infections: A Position Statement of the Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Surgical treatment of adrenal tumors during pregnancy.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A guide for physiotherapeutic care during pregnancy, labor, and the postpartum period during the COVID-19 pandemic.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Prone positioning and high-flow oxygen improved respiratory function in a 25-week pregnant woman with COVID-19.European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Claudia OliveiraFisioterapia, Universidade Santa Cecilia, Santos, SP, BR.
Marco Antonio Borges LopesDepartamento de Obstetricia e Ginecologia, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR.
Agatha Sacramento RodriguesInstituto de Matematica e Estatistica, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR.
Marcelo ZugaibDepartamento de Obstetricia e Ginecologia, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR.
Rossana Pulcineli Vieira FranciscoDepartamento de Obstetricia e Ginecologia, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR.
Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Santa Cecília · BRBrazilian Society of Computational and Applied Mathematics · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectives: To analyze the influence of lying in prone position on a specially designed stretcher on the maternal-fetal hemodynamic parameters and comfort of pregnant women.

methods: A randomized, controlled trial with 33 pregnant women divided into 2 groups: pregnant group sequence 1 and pregnant group sequence 2. The order of positions used in sequence 1 was Fowler's position, prone position, supine position, left lateral, Fowler's position 2, supine position 2, prone position 2 and left lateral 2. The order of positions used in sequence 2 was Fowler's position, prone position, left lateral, supine position, Fowler's position 2, left lateral 2, prone position 2 and supine position 2. Each woman remained in each position for 6 minutes. For the statistical analyses, we used Wilcoxon's test for 2 paired samples when comparing the prone position with the other positions. The variables are presented in graphs showing the means and 95% confidence intervals. Trial Registration: Clinical Trial No. ISRCTN41359519.

results: All the parameters were within the standards of normality. There were no differences between positions in terms of maternal heart rate, diastolic blood pressure, oxygen saturation and fetal heart rate. However, there were significant decreases in respiratory rate and systolic blood pressure in prone position 2 compared with left lateral 2. There was an increase in oxygen saturation in prone position compared with Fowler's position and supine position 2 in both sequences. All the women reported feeling comfortable in the prone position.

conclusions: The prone position was considered safe and comfortable and could be advantageous for improving oxygen saturation and reducing the systolic blood pressure and respiratory rate.

Indexed as

StretchersAdultFemaleHemodynamicsHumansPatient ComfortPregnancyProne PositionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID28658431
PMCPMC5463251
OpenAlexW2625427967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.