Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28658367›Full record

ArticleRevista de saude publica2017

Potentially inappropriate medications among older adults in Pelotas, Southern Brazil.

Bárbara Heather Lutz, Vanessa Irribarem Avena Miranda, Andréa Dâmaso Bertoldi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista de saude publica, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Prevalence and Associated Factors of Polypharmacy in Nursing Home Residents: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bárbara Heather LutzPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Epidemiologia. Universidade Federal de Pelotas. Pelotas, RS, Brasil.
Vanessa Irribarem Avena MirandaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Epidemiologia. Universidade Federal de Pelotas. Pelotas, RS, Brasil.
Andréa Dâmaso BertoldiPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Epidemiologia. Universidade Federal de Pelotas. Pelotas, RS, Brasil.
Universidade Federal de Pelotas · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the use of potentially inappropriate medications among older adults.

methodsThis is a population-based cross-sectional study with 1,451 older individuals aged 60 years or more in the city of Pelotas, State of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, in 2014. We have investigated the use of medications in the last 15 days. Using the Beers criteria (2012), we have verified the use of potentially inappropriate medications and their relationship with socioeconomic and demographic variables, polypharmacy, self-medication, and burden of disease.

resultsAmong the 5,700 medications used, 5,651 could be assessed as to being inappropriate. Of these, 937 were potentially inappropriate for the older adults according to the 2012 Beers criteria (16.6%). Approximately 42.4% of the older adults studied used at least one medication considered as potentially inappropriate. The group of medications for the nervous system accounted for 48.9% of the total of the potentially inappropriate medications. In the adjusted analysis, the variables female, advanced age, white race, low educational level, polypharmacy, self-medication, and burden of disease were associated with the use of potentially inappropriate medications.

conclusionsIt is important to known the possible consequences of the use of medication among older adults. Special attention should be given to the older adults who use polypharmacy. Specific lists should be created with more appropriate medications for the older population in the National Essential Medicine List. OBJETIVO: Avaliar o uso de medicamentos potencialmente inadequados entre idosos. MÉTODOS: Estudo transversal de base populacional com 1.451 idosos com 60 anos ou mais em Pelotas, RS, em 2014. Investigou-se o uso de medicamentos nos últimos 15 dias. Utilizando os critérios de Beers (2012), verificou-se a potencial inadequação dos medicamentos e sua relação com variáveis socioeconômicas e demográficas, polifarmácia, automedicação e carga de doença. RESULTADOS: Dentre os 5.700 medicamentos utilizados, 5.651 puderam ser avaliados quanto à inadequação. Destes, 937 eram potencialmente inadequados para idosos segundo os critérios de Beers de 2012 (16,6%). Cerca de 42,4% dos idosos usaram no mínimo um medicamento considerado potencialmente inapropriado. O grupo de medicamentos para o sistema nervoso correspondeu a 48,9% do total de medicamentos potencialmente inadequados. Na análise ajustada, as variáveis sexo feminino, idade avançada, cor da pele branca, baixa escolaridade, polifarmácia, automedicação e carga de doença mostraram-se associadas ao uso de medicamentos potencialmente inadequados. CONCLUSÕES: É importante que sejam bem conhecidas as possíveis consequências do uso de medicamentos entre idosos. Atenção especial deve ser dada aos idosos que fazem uso de polifarmácia. É necessário existir listas específicas com medicamentos mais adequados para uso em idosos na Relação Nacional de Medicamentos Essenciais.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAge DistributionAge FactorsBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInappropriate PrescribingMaleMiddle AgedPolypharmacyPotentially Inappropriate Medication ListRisk FactorsSelf MedicationSex Distribution

Identifiers

PMID28658367
PMCPMC5493363
OpenAlexW2687518290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.