Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28658204›Full record

ArticleNature2017

Tracing the origins of relapse in acute myeloid leukaemia to stem cells.

Liran I Shlush, Amanda Mitchell, Lawrence Heisler, Sagi Abelson, Stanley W K Ng, Aaron Trotman-Grant, Jessie J F Medeiros, Abilasha Rao-Bhatia, Ivana Jaciw-Zurakowsky, Rene Marke and 10 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 374 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
374citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

374 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A Novel Potent and Selective GCN2 Inhibitor, APL-4098, Has Antileukemic Activity through Dysregulation of Mitochondrial Function.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

314 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Liran I ShlushPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2M9, Canada.
Amanda MitchellPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2M9, Canada.
Lawrence HeislerOntario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario M5G 0A3, Canada.
Sagi AbelsonPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2M9, Canada.
Stanley W K NgPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2M9, Canada.
Aaron Trotman-GrantPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2M9, Canada.
Jessie J F MedeirosPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2M9, Canada.
Abilasha Rao-BhatiaPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2M9, Canada.
Ivana Jaciw-ZurakowskyPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2M9, Canada.
Rene MarkeLaboratory of Pediatric Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen 6525 GA, The Netherlands.
Jessica L McLeodPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2M9, Canada.
Monica DoedensPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2M9, Canada.
Gary BaderDepartment of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A8, Canada.
Veronique VoisinDonnelly Centre for Cellular and Biomolecular Research, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3E1, Canada.
ChangJiang XuDonnelly Centre for Cellular and Biomolecular Research, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3E1, Canada.
John D McPhersonOntario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario M5G 0A3, Canada.
Thomas J HudsonOntario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario M5G 0A3, Canada.
Jean C Y WangPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2M9, Canada.
Mark D MindenPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2M9, Canada.
John E DickPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2M9, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In acute myeloid leukaemia, long-term survival is poor as most patients relapse despite achieving remission. Historically, the failure of therapy has been thought to be due to mutations that produce drug resistance, possibly arising as a consequence of the mutagenic properties of chemotherapy drugs. However, other lines of evidence have pointed to the pre-existence of drug-resistant cells. For example, deep sequencing of paired diagnosis and relapse acute myeloid leukaemia samples has provided direct evidence that relapse in some cases is generated from minor genetic subclones present at diagnosis that survive chemotherapy, suggesting that resistant cells are generated by evolutionary processes before treatment and are selected by therapy. Nevertheless, the mechanisms of therapy failure and capacity for leukaemic regeneration remain obscure, as sequence analysis alone does not provide insight into the cell types that are fated to drive relapse. Although leukaemia stem cells have been linked to relapse owing to their dormancy and self-renewal properties, and leukaemia stem cell gene expression signatures are highly predictive of therapy failure, experimental studies have been primarily correlative and a role for leukaemia stem cells in acute myeloid leukaemia relapse has not been directly proved. Here, through combined genetic and functional analysis of purified subpopulations and xenografts from paired diagnosis/relapse samples, we identify therapy-resistant cells already present at diagnosis and two major patterns of relapse. In some cases, relapse originated from rare leukaemia stem cells with a haematopoietic stem/progenitor cell phenotype, while in other instances relapse developed from larger subclones of immunophenotypically committed leukaemia cells that retained strong stemness transcriptional signatures. The identification of distinct patterns of relapse should lead to improved methods for disease management and monitoring in acute myeloid leukaemia. Moreover, the shared functional and transcriptional stemness properties that underlie both cellular origins of relapse emphasize the importance of developing new therapeutic approaches that target stemness to prevent relapse.

Indexed as

Cell LineageAnimalsClone CellsFemaleHumansImmunophenotypingLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMiceMutationMyeloid Progenitor CellsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplastic Stem Cells

Identifiers

PMID28658204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.